[00:00:02] GOOD AFTERNOON. AND WE'RE GOING TO CALL THE. BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION'S MEETING TO ORDER AT [I. CALL TO ORDER] 03:31 P.M.. WE DO HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT. THIS MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER. WE HAVE ITEM TWO IS OPEN FORUM CITIZENS COMMENTS. SO DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZENS THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ANY ISSUES OR ANYTHING? ANYBODY? NOBODY'S ONLINE. WE'RE ALL GOOD TO GO. OKAY. THEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO ITEM THREE, WHICH IS ACTION ITEMS. [III.1. 803 N. Newark Street - (Code Case No. 3454) The Commission will receive an update, discuss, and take any appropriate action regarding compliance with its previous orders concerning the property owned by Anna Juno Bible, located at 803 N. Newark Street, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas, and further described as Proctor Addition, Block 54, Tracts 4 and 5. The property was declared substandard by the Commission on February 18, 2026, and an Order of Demolition was issued on May 18, 2026.] AND I THINK DENNY HAS SOME STUFF TO GO OVER WITH US. I WANT TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON THE 803 NORTH NEWARK STRUCTURE THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON FOR A WHILE. WE ALL HAD ISSUED A DEMO ORDER ON THIS, AND THEY DECIDED THEY WOULD TRY TO DO IT THEIRSELVES. AND IT'S TAKEN SOME TIME, BUT THEY HAVE THEY'VE GOT THE STRUCTURE DOWN. THEY'VE GOT IT REMOVED. I MEAN, CLEANED UP THE GROUND. IT ALL LOOKS GOOD. THEY'VE JUST GOT ABOUT TWO TRAILER LOADS OF MATERIAL THAT THEY NEED TO HAUL OFF THE PROPERTY TO BE COMPLETELY DONE. SO, YOU KNOW HE DID IT ALL BY HAND. THAT'S THAT'S QUITE A BIT OF THAT'S A BIG TASK TO DO IT ALL BY HAND. BUT THEY DID GET IT DONE. AND AND WHEN THEY GET THESE LAST TWO DONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE CASE OUT. WHEN THEY GET THOSE LAST TRAILER LOADS ALL OFF. IT LOOKS REALLY GOOD OVER THERE. IT LOOKS A LOT BETTER. IT'S A LOT SAFER. Y'ALL GOT ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT ONE? NO, I THINK IT'S PRETTY NEAT THAT THEY DID IT. GOT GOT THE MOVING ON IT. WE GOT THE 302 SOUTH LANE UPDATE. THE OWNERS OF THIS PROPERTY HAD, YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN, THEY'VE CAME IN AND SAID THEY WERE GOING TO GET PERMITS TO DO THE, THE CORRECTIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY ON IT. THEY FINALLY DECIDED THEY WAS GOING TO DEMO IT. WE GAVE THEM 90 DAYS. SO IN SEPTEMBER, MIDDLE OF SEPTEMBER. GOT IT RIGHT HERE. I THINK IT'S SEPTEMBER 14TH. THERE'S, I REMEMBER READING. ON 14TH JULY WHEN THEY PULLED THE PERMIT. WHAT DO YOU GET HERE? IT'LL EXPIRE ON SEPTEMBER 14, 2026. YOU DID ONE SIDED. YOU'RE MISSING A PAGE. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. BUT IT'LL BE COMING UP THIS MONTH. SO IF NOTHING HAPPENS BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, WE'LL PROBABLY BE COMING BEFORE REQUESTING THAT WE GET AN ORDER FOR DEMO. HOPEFULLY THEY'LL GET SOMETHING DONE ON THAT AND GET THAT TAKEN CARE OF. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT STRUCTURE? I'LL PASS IT ON WAYNE THEN. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS. [III.3. 300 S. Houston Street - (Code Case No. 3498) The Commission will receive an update, discuss, and take any appropriate action regarding compliance with its previous orders concerning the property owned by Kamy Real Property Trust, located at 300 S. Houston Street, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas, and further described as Block 50, Tarleton Addition. The property was declared substandard by the Commission on May 18, 2026. The property owner was ordered to repair, remove, or demolish the building within 30 days and to secure the structure until the property was brought into compliance. Following the owner's failure to comply, the Commission ordered the structure demolished on July 20, 2026, pursuant to Article IV, "Unsafe, Dangerous, or Hazardous Buildings and Structures," Section 10-107, "Failure to Comply," of the City of Decatur Code of Ordinances. ] I WANT TO TALK ABOUT 300 SOUTH HOUSTON STREET. THIS IS SOME THIS IS A STRUCTURE THAT THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION HAS BEEN DEALING WITH SINCE MARCH OF THIS YEAR. INITIAL NOTICES WENT OUT AT THAT TIME. AND THEN WE ENDED UP PULLING THE OWNERSHIP ENCUMBRANCE REPORT AND TAX STATEMENTS AND BRINGING IT BEFORE THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION FOR THE MAY 18TH MEETING ON THERE AT THAT TIME. BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE AND ORDERED IT TO BE REPAIRED, REMOVED, OR DEMOLISHED WITHIN 30 DAYS. PROPERTY OWNER WAS NOTIFIED OF THAT DECISION BY THE BOARD. THERE WAS A MIX UP IN ONE OF THE MAILINGS AS TO THE DATE ON THAT, BUT IT WAS LATER CORRECTED. THE, THE DATE FOR COMPLIANCE WAS CORRECT ON THERE, THE DATE OF THE NOTICE THAT WAS SENT TO HIM WAS CORRECT ON THERE. THE DATE OF THE MEETING WAS MISREPRESENTED IN THE MAILING. [00:05:03] WE LATER CORRECTED THAT WITH HIM AND MADE SURE HE HAD THE RIGHT DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT TOOK PLACE ON THERE. WE'VE HAD CONTACT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS A COUPLE OF TIMES THROUGHOUT THIS, MOSTLY BY PHONE, SOME EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE THAT HAS COME IN DURING THAT TIME. BUT THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE NOT ACTED ON THIS PROPERTY AT ALL. AND THEN IN JUNE, WE WENT AHEAD AND SENT THEM THE NOTICE THAT WE WERE TAKING IT BACK TO BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION AS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER ON JUNE 15TH WE BROUGHT FORWARD THE THE INFORMATION FOR THAT, BUT WE WERE JUST A LITTLE BIT SHORT ON THE TIME FRAME THAT WAS GIVEN FOR THEM TO REMOVE OR DEMOLISH THAT BUILDING. SO TOOK NO ACTION AT THAT TIME. AND WENT BACK AND NOTIFIED THEM AGAIN OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE PLACE FOR THE JULY 17TH BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION MEETING. NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT TO THEM. BY THE WAY, ALL OF THESE NOTIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND HAVE SIGNATURES WHENEVER THEY WERE RECEIVED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. SO BUT AT THAT JULY 17TH MEETING THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION TOOK ACTION AND ORDERED THE BUILDING REMOVED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING STANDARD COMMISSION ORDER TO REPAIR OR REMOVE OR DEMOLISH. SINCE THAT TIME, WE HAVE RECEIVED A CITATION IN THE MAIL WHERE THEY ARE FILING A CASE AGAINST THE CITY. I'M GOING TO LET PAM TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT AND WHAT THAT MEANS. SURE. SO THEY APPARENTLY THEY THE OWNER OF THE BUILDING HAD FILED A LAWSUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION ON THE PROPERTY ON JUNE 23RD, BUT THE CITY AND THE BSC WAS UNAWARE OF THAT BECAUSE THE LAWSUIT WAS NOT SERVED ON US UNTIL AUGUST 3RD. SO WE'RE IN THE PROCESS. WE'VE GOT AN ANSWER DATE OF AUGUST 24TH, AND I'LL BE FILING AN ANSWER IN THE CASE. SO THERE IS NO DEFAULT JUDGMENT TAKEN. AND I'LL BE FILING A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, CITING THE PROCEDURE THAT WAS FOLLOWED IN THE CASE AND THE ORDER THAT WAS ISSUED BY THE BSC. SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE. THERE'S NOTHING RIGHT NOW THAT'S HAPPENING OTHER THAN MY CREATION OF THE ANSWER AND THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. AND WE'LL LET YOU KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY HEARINGS IN THE CASE. WE'LL LET YOU KNOW THAT SO THAT YOU COULD COME IF YOU WANTED TO. BUT THE FROM FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I'M NOT CONCERNED ABOUT IT. I THINK THAT THE CITY AND THE BSC WILL PREVAIL. I THINK THE COURT WILL UPHOLD THE BSC ORDER, BUT WE HAVE TO NOW GO THROUGH THE PROCESS OF THE COURT FILING. ANY QUESTIONS THAT THE COMMISSION HAS ON THIS CASE AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. DANNY, YOU LOOK LIKE YOU DID. HOW ONGOING IS THIS GOING TO BE? IT'S UNKNOWN, BUT SINCE THEY HAVE REQUESTED AN INJUNCTION, THOSE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE SET WITH EXPEDIENCE BY THE COURT. SO HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE A HEARING QUICKLY BECAUSE OF THE NATURE OF THE FILING. BUT I CAN'T SAY FOR SURE HOW LONG IT WILL GO ON. AND ANY HEARING WILL BE IN DECATUR. YES, IT'LL BE IN WISE COUNTY. IF YOU ALL DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AS THAT COME UP, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO GET WITH ME. SEND ME AN EMAIL. CALL ME IF YOU DON'T HAVE MY CELL NUMBER. I CAN GIVE IT TO YOU AFTER THE MEETING. YOU KNOW THE DISCUSSIONS ON ANY OF THOSE ISSUES. THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM FOUR, DISCUSSION ITEMS OF CURRENT CODE ENFORCEMENT AND ACTIONS AND SCHEDULES. YES, SIR. I DO HAVE THREE ITEMS ON THE DISCUSSION ITEMS AGENDA ITEM TODAY. THE FIRST ONE IS 3021 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE. THIS IS A NEW ONE WE'RE BRINGING BEFORE YOU. THIS IS SOMETHING THIS STARTED QUITE A WHILE BACK. OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR IS WHEN THIS INITIAL EVENT HAPPENED. [00:10:04] IT'S A STORM IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD OR IN DECATUR. AND IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, THEY HAD A RETAINING WALL THAT THAT FAILED DURING THAT TIME AND COLLAPSED, SUBSEQUENTLY COLLAPSED ALONG THREE PROPERTIES. THERE ARE PORTIONS OF THE RETAINING WALL THAT ARE STILL STANDING AT THE ENDS OF THIS, BUT IT IS A CONTINUOUS RETAINING WALL THAT RUNS ACROSS THIS PROPERTY. SO AFTER THAT STORM EVENT THE CITY HAS KIND OF MONITORED THE SITUATION. SOME PROPERTY OWNERS STARTED MAKING PLANS TO GET THE WALL REPAIRED AND TO TAKE SOME ACTION TO GET THINGS BACK TO A NORMAL SITUATION OVER THERE. SUBSEQUENTLY THEY HAD A, THE DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY STEPPED IN AND HAS DECIDED TO WORK THROUGH THIS TO CORRECT THIS SITUATION. THEY HAVE CONTACTED ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OVER THERE. THERE ARE EIGHT PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE IMPACTED BY THIS. WE DO HAVE ONE PROPERTY OWNER THAT HAS CHOSEN NOT TO USE THE CONTRACTOR THAT THAT, THAT THE REST OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE USING. AND THAT'S, FINE. THAT'S, THEIR CHOICE. BUT DURING THIS DISCOVERY, WHEN WE FOUND THIS OUT, WE ASKED THAT CONTRACTOR FOR ALL OF THEIR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS. AND AT THAT TIME, THEY PROVIDED US WITH A ENGINEERING REPORT THAT SAYS THAT THIS WALL IS AN IMMINENT THREAT TO PEOPLE AND PROPERTY THAT'S OVER THERE. THOSE THINGS ARE KIND OF THINGS THAT THROW UP OUR SENSES AND, AND CAUSE US TO ACT IMMEDIATELY WITH THOSE THINGS. SO ONCE WE FOUND THAT OUT, WE MADE CONTACT WITH THIS LAST PROPERTY OWNER THAT, HASN'T MOVED FORWARD YET AND ASKED TO TAKE A LOOK AT THEIR WALL AND WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE ON THERE. YOUR PACKET DOES HAVE SOME PICTURES THAT ARE INCLUDED WITH THIS. THIS IS JUST A DISCUSSION ITEM. HOWEVER, JUST SO THAT YOU'RE AWARE OF THIS THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO GET THEIR OWN CONTRACTOR AND WE'RE FINE WITH HOWEVER THEY WANT TO PROCEED WITH THAT. BUT TO THIS POINT, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY INFORMATION ON HOW THEY WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED WITH THAT. AND DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THAT WALL AND THE PROSPECT OF WHAT COULD HAPPEN WITH THAT BASED ON THAT ENGINEERING REPORT, WE'D LIKE TO GO AHEAD AND GET THIS MOVING FORWARD AND GET PLANS IN PLACE FOR THIS. WE'VE LIKE I SAID, WE'VE MADE CONTACT WITH THE OWNER. THEY, THEY DID NOT PROVIDE ANY DIRECTION THAT THEY WERE HEADED WITH GETTING THIS REPAIRED OR REPLACED. AND SO AT THIS POINT, WE HAVE MAILED A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TO THAT PROPERTY OWNER, LETTING THEM KNOW THAT WE NEED YOUR PLAN TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS. BUT BECAUSE OF THE DANGER AND THE HAZARDOUS CONDITION THAT THAT IS THERE, WE ARE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A BUILDING STANDARDS CASE SO THAT WE'RE ABLE TO GET THIS TAKEN CARE OF BEFORE ANYTHING WORSENS AT THAT LOCATION. SO THAT BEING THE CASE, I AM ASKING THAT THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION HAVE A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING JUST TO HANDLE THIS ONE CASE. WE'LL BRING FORWARD ALL OF THE INFORMATION YOU HAVE, THE FINDINGS OF FACT THAT ARE BEFORE YOU RIGHT NOW UP TO LAST WEEK. THOSE WILL BE UPDATED FOR THE NEW HEARING WHENEVER WE HAVE THAT. BUT IT DOES GIVE YOU ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE TO DATE ON HERE. AS SOON AS WE SET THIS SPECIAL CALLED MEETING WE WILL NOTIFY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THAT WILL GIVE THEM THE REQUIRED TEN DAYS THAT ARE CALLED OUT BY STATE LAW AND LOCAL ORDINANCE FOR THEM TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COMMISSION TO TO ADDRESS THIS. IT DOES TELL THEM THAT THEY, THEY WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A PLAN OF ACTION MOVING FORWARD. AT THIS TIME, I WAS ABLE TO SPEAK WITH OUR CHAIRMAN THE OTHER DAY WHENEVER I FOUND OUT HE WAS NOT GOING TO BE HERE THE OTHER DAY. AND HE DID SAY THAT HE WAS FINE WITH A DATE OF THE 31ST OF AUGUST, WE ARE ABLE TO MAKE OUR NEWSPAPER NOTIFICATIONS WITH THE TEN DAY NOTICE AND GET A NOTIFICATION IN THE MAIL BY CERTIFIED MAIL OUT TO THEM IN THE PRESCRIBED AMOUNT OF TIME. FOR THIS ALSO, IF WE HAVE A 31ST AUGUST MEETING, HE DID ASK THAT IT BE MOVED TO 5:30 TO ACCOMMODATE FOR THEM AND FOR THE PROPERTY [00:15:07] OWNERS FOR AFTER HOURS. SO AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THE COMMISSION THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO SET A QUORUM FOR THAT AUGUST 31ST MEETING AT 5:30 P.M.. ANY OPPOSED TO THAT? I'D HAVE TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS. IT'S NOT A NO, BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY A QUORUM ON THIS? FOUR, I BELIEVE FOUR. A STRICT QUORUM IS THREE. BUT FOR MANY OF YOUR ACTIONS YOU HAVE TO HAVE FOUR. SO WE'RE GOING TO CALL IT FOUR. AND COMMISSIONER CLINESMITH SAID THAT HE WOULD BE ABLE TO BE HERE FOR THAT MEETING ALSO. OKAY. YEAH. LIKE I SAID, I CAN'T COMMIT TODAY, BUT I WOULD NEED TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS IF I NEED TO BE HERE. BUT IT LOOKS LIKE WE WOULD HAVE ENOUGH COMMITTED. IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH. ALL RIGHT. I THINK SO. SO WE'LL WORK ON GETTING THAT. YOU'LL RECEIVE THOSE THINGS IN THE COMING DAYS. WE'VE ALREADY GOT STARTED ON ALL THE NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES AND EVERYTHING SO THAT WE CAN MOVE THROUGH THIS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE ON THERE. IT TAKES A WHILE TO GET EVERYTHING UP AND RUNNING AND MAKE SURE WE HAVE ALL OF OUR T'S CROSSED AND OUR I'S DOTTED THROUGH THESE THINGS. BUT ONCE WE HAVE THAT AND IT HITS THAT SCHEDULE, WE HAVE A DEFINITIVE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT WE WILL BE ABLE TO WORK IN. AND SO WE'LL CONTINUE TO TO MOVE THAT. JUST EXPECT SOME INFORMATION ON A AUGUST 31ST MEETING AT THAT TIME. ALSO, THE BIGGEST THING THAT I COMMENT ON THAT IS AS YOU READ UP THERE, YOU CAN READ DOWN HERE, BUT THE DANGER STRUCTURE CASE, AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE PICTURES, IF WE HAVE A GOOD RAINSTORM, THAT COULD REALLY IT COULD DO A LOT OF PROPERTY DAMAGE TO HOMEOWNERS BEYOND WHAT IT DOES RIGHT NOW. YES, SIR. THAT'S WHY WE WANTED TO GET IT IN HERE AS QUICKLY AS WE COULD IN THE MEETING ON THE 30TH. 31ST. 31ST WILL BE A MOTION MADE AND A VOTE. YOU WILL BE ABLE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING, AND THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION WILL DETERMINE IF YOU CAN IF IT MEETS THE QUALIFICATIONS AS A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE, AND THEN YOU'LL GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS FOR ASSIGNING A TIMELINE FOR THAT, FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF THAT? YES, IT'LL BE THE SAME PROCESS AS IN OTHER CASES. FIRST, YOU'LL MAKE A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER OR NOT IT IS SUBSTANDARD, AND THEN YOU'LL DISCUSS AND ENTER AN ACTION ON WHAT THE. IF YOU FIND THAT IT IS A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE, WHAT THE BSC WILL ORDER IN THE CASE TO BE DONE TO EITHER REPAIR OR REMOVE OR DEMOLISH THE SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE. THAT'S NOT MY PROBLEM. MY PROBLEM IS, AS A HOMEOWNER IN THIS VICINITY, AM I AVAILABLE TO VOTE ON ANYTHING LIKE THAT, OR WOULD I HAVE TO RECUSE MYSELF? YOU DON'T HAVE TO RECUSE YOURSELF BECAUSE YOU'RE A RESIDENT AND YOU HAVE YOUR SEAT HERE ON THE BSC AND IT'S NOT YOUR PROPERTY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. SO THE SECOND DISCUSSION ITEM IS FOR 204 WEST BRADY. [IV.2. 204 W. Brady Street - Substandard Structures (Code Case No. 3492) During the investigation of a complaint, City staff identified a substandard structure with a damaged roof, unsecured openings, and multiple violations of the minimum standards established by City ordinance. The property owners have been notified by certified mail of the dangerous and damaged conditions; however, no response has been received. An ownership and encumbrance report identified multiple lien holders who must be located and provided the required notice. Staff will continue its notification efforts. If the conditions are not corrected, the case will be brought before the Commission for a determination of a substandard structure and establishment of the required corrective actions and timeframes.] THAT IS ALSO A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE. IT'S BEEN ON SOME OF YOUR DISCUSSION ITEMS IN THE PAST. WE DECIDED TO MOVE FORWARD ON IT THIS TIME. BUT ONCE WE GOT THAT OWNERSHIP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT BACK, WE DID FIND SEVERAL LIENS ON THAT PROPERTY. AND SO WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE STEPPED BACK SO THAT WE CAN MAKE THE NOTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR THOSE LIEN HOLDERS FOR THIS PROPERTY, BUT IT WILL BE BACK BACK ON THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION AGENDA AGAIN. IF WE CAN GET ALL OF THE HOLDERS NOTIFIED IN THE TIME FRAME WE HOPE TO HAVE IT BACK ON AT THE REGULAR SEPTEMBER MEETING. HOWEVER, IF WE DON'T, IF WE'RE NOT ABLE TO AFFECT ALL OF THOSE NOTIFICATIONS IT MAY MOVE BACK TO THE OCTOBER. AND THIS ONE IS A DISCUSSION ITEM ALSO. BUT YOU DO HAVE THE THE PICTURES THAT ARE INCLUDED WITH THESE ALSO. AND THEN YOU HAVE THE FINDINGS OF FACTS THAT ARE ON THAT PROPERTY AS WELL. AND YOU WILL SEE THIS, THIS PROPERTY AGAIN BASED ON THE CONDITION THAT IT'S IN. AND THEN THE LAST ONE IS 502 NORTH NEWARK. WE'VE SPENT A LOT OF TIME TRYING TO GAIN COMPLIANCE THROUGH THE PROPERTY [IV.3. 502 N. Newark Street - Substandard Structure (Code Case No. 3347) City staff has been in contact with the property owner and continues to work with the owner to obtain voluntary compliance. The structure contains hazardous conditions; however, no progress has been made to correct those conditions to date. If the conditions are not corrected voluntarily, the case will be brought before the Commission for a determination of a substandard structure and establishment of the required corrective actions and timeframes. ] [00:20:09] OWNER ON THIS. IT THE THE STRUCTURE IS SECURED AT THIS TIME. IT'S STILL IN A SUBSTANDARD STATE. HOWEVER, IT IS NOT IN DANGER OF ANYBODY GETTING INTO IT BECAUSE IT IS COMPLETELY SECURED AT THIS TIME. WE WILL HAVE IT BACK. BUT BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE HEAVY LIFTING THAT WE'VE GOT ON SOME OF THESE OTHER CASES THAT WE'RE MOVING FORWARD, WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO PUSH THIS ONE BACK JUST A LITTLE BIT, SINCE IT IS A SECURED STRUCTURE AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY IMMINENT DANGERS WITH THIS ONE AT THIS TIME. AND THEN THE LAST ONE IS ITEM FIVE. AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM FIVE CONSENT AND AGENDA ITEMS. [V. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ] ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS LISTED ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION AND MAY BE MAY BE RECOMMENDED IN ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS REQUESTED BY A COMMISSIONER, IN WHICH THE EVENT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED IN ITS NORMAL PLACE ON THE AGENDA. ITEM 1A APPROVED JUNE 15TH, 2026 BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION MINUTES. SO THESE ARE ALL UNDER ONE. SO IT'S 1A AND 1A. OH AND 1B APPROVED JULY 2026. UNLESS SOMEBODY WANTS TO PULL ONE OF THOSE SOMEONE COULD MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS WRITTEN, OR ANY OF YOU COULD PULL ONE OR OTHER OF THE MINUTES. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS AS WRITTEN. SECOND. GO AHEAD. OKAY. MOTIONS MADE. ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. AYE. ANY NAYS? NO. SORRY. FINISH YOUR VOTE. I WANTED TO KNOW WHO YOU RECOGNIZED FOR THE SECOND. JAY WAS MADE THE MOTION. DANNY SECONDS. THANK YOU. SORRY. THAT'S OKAY. OH, OKAY. SORRY I INTERRUPTED YOUR VOTE. MR. GILLESPIE, I'M SO SORRY I INTERRUPTED YOUR VOTE. DID. I DIDN'T SEE THE VOTE. COULD YOU SHOW THE VOTE? ALL IN FAVOR OF ACCEPTING THE AGENDA ITEMS? SAY AYE. AYE. ANY NAYS? ITEM SIX. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. [VI. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS ] HAVE ONE BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION IS SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2026 AT 03:30. TWO DEPENDING ON NOTICES AND PROPERTY OWNERS ACTIONS, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC HEARINGS MAY BE SCHEDULED. AND WE'VE ALSO ADDED JUST A REMINDER THAT WE'RE GOING TO SET A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING FOR AUGUST 31ST. YES, THERE IS A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING OF AUGUST 31ST AT 5:30 P.M. WILL BE IN THIS BUILDING. AND THAT'S IT. AND ITEM SEVEN IS MEETING ADJOURNMENT. THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 3:54 P.M.. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.