[CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM] [00:00:04] GO AHEAD AND CALL THE PNC COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER FOR WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER THE 5TH. MOVING INTO ITEM 1, CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF THE PNC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER THE 30TH OF 2025. [ITEM 1: Consider and take appropriate action regarding the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes from September 30, 2025.] COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ABOUT THOSE MINUTES? HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES. MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER EILEEN CROSS. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER JOHN LANIER. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. ITEM 2, CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF THE PNC COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FROM OCTOBER THE 7TH, [ITEM 2: Consider and take appropriate action regarding the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes from October 7, 2025.] 2025. COMMISSIONERS, ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? OKAY HEARING NONE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT OR DENY. MAKE A MOTION TO BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER JOHN LANIER TO ACCEPT IT. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SHORT TIME TERRY BERUBE [LAUGHTER]. ALL IN FAVOR AYE? AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES. OKAY WE'RE GOING TO BE MOVING INTO THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS AT THIS POINT. [ITEM 3: RP-25-0013 – Consider and take action regarding a 30-day extension request for a replat application for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Delgado Place, being a replat of Lot 5, Block 11, Devereux Addition, portion of Lot 4, Block 10, Devereux Addition, abandoned portion Elm Street, abandoned portion alley in the Devereux addition, located in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. (30-day Extension Request) (Rogelio Delgado)] THIS SOUNDS AWFUL LOUD. LET ME BACK IT UP A LITTLE BIT. WHEN WE GO INTO THE PUBLIC HEARING THE COMMISSIONERS WILL IS NOT ALLOWED TO ASK QUESTIONS OR RESPOND TO QUESTIONS OR COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE COMMISSIONERS WILL RESERVE ALL THE QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. AND THE COMMISSIONERS WILL RESERVE THAT UNTIL THE DISCUSSION ITEM IS OPEN AND WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS NOW 5:32. LISA, ITEM 3. SIR FOR THE RECORD. SO ITEM NUMBER 3 IS A REPLAT 25-0013 NORTH LANE STREET. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A 30-DAY EXTENSION REQUEST. WE'VE GOT SOME EXISTING NON-CONFORMING SETBACKS WE'RE WORKING THROUGH, AND WE NEED TO WE'RE WORKING WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER TO GET THOSE TAKEN CARE OF, AND EITHER THAT OR MOVE IT THROUGH THE BOARD OF ZONING, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. SO WE DO RECOMMEND THE THEIR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE EXTENSION REQUEST FOR 30-DAYS. IT WOULD COME BACK TO THE DECEMBER 2ND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. WE WON'T HAVE TO HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING. I DON'T HAVE TO OKAY SO IT IS AN ACTION ITEM. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY, HEARING THAT, THEN I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IT IS NOW 5:33. COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS COMMENTS, CONCERNS? OKAY HEARING NONE I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO. I'LL OFFER A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION. OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION. I WILL FOLLOW THAT UP WITH THE SECOND. I'VE GOT A FIRST FROM COMMISSIONER MASON WOODRUFF TO APPROVE THE 30-DAY. I GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER WILL KLOSE. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED. OKAY WE'RE GOING BACK INTO PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 4 IT IS NOW 5:34. [ITEM 4: RP-25-0014 – Public hearing, discussion, and make a recommendation to the City Council to Replat Lots 2R-1 and 2R-2 and 3R-1 and 3R-2, Block 116, South Decatur Addition, and being a replat of Lots 2 – 3, Block 116, South Decatur Addition, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. (City of Decatur)] GOOD EVENING, LISA HANNON, PLANNING DIRECTOR. I'LL ENTER OUR STAFF REPORT INTO THE RECORD IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE. SO THERE ARE FOUR LOTS ON HATCHER STREET 1701, 1703, 1705 AND 1707. SOUTH HATCHER STREET, TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE STATES THAT THIS CAN BE LEGALLY PLATTED, AND THEY DO MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, SO THE CITY HAS INITIATED THIS REPLAT REQUEST. WE'RE CLEANING UP OUR RECORDS. THE CITY OWNS THE PROPERTY THAT'S AT 1707. THE ONE ON THE CORNER OF HATCHER AND THOMPSON. IT'S WHERE THE OLD WATER TOWER USED TO RESIDE. SO THAT PROPERTY WENT UP FOR SALE AND GETTING SOME SURVEYS THERE IS AN ALLEY THAT HAD BEEN ON THE PLATS UNTIL 1968. IT'S NOT A PLATTED. IT'S NOT PLATTED AS AN ALLEY. IT'S PART OF THE PROPERTY. SO IN ORDER TO HAVE THE PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND HAVE HAVE EVERYTHING PROPERLY PLATTED, WE'RE TRYING TO MEMORIALIZE THE ALLEY, WHICH WILL SHOW ALL THE SHOW IT AS AN INGRESS EGRESS EASEMENT AS WELL AS OUR UTILITY EASEMENT. THE CITY DOES HAVE UTILITIES WITHIN THAT AREA. [00:05:02] THE CITY IS BEARING ALL THE EXPENSES FOR THE REPLAT APPLICATION. WE HAVE COME ACROSS SOME NON-CONFORMING SETBACKS. WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THAT PROCESS AS WELL FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS. WE ARE PRESENTING THAT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS ON THE 17TH, AND THIS SHOWS YOU WHERE SOME OF THE SETBACK DEVIATIONS ARE FOR THREE OF THE PROPERTIES. FRONT SETBACK AND A SIDE SETBACK. A FRONT SETBACK TO THE STRUCTURE PRIMARY STRUCTURE AND A SIDE SETBACK FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND THEN A FRONT SETBACK. ALL OF THESE ARE RUNNING CONCURRENTLY WITH THE REPLAT PROCESS. SO WE DID NOTIFY THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE 200FT. WE'VE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSES BACK FROM ANYBODY JUST SO WE DID RECEIVE ONE RESPONSE BACK TONIGHT. OH, OKAY IN FAVOR OF. IN FAVOR OF? OKAY, I'M SORRY. WAS UNAWARE OF THAT OKAY. SO WE GOT ONE BACK IN FAVOR OF. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REPLANT REQUEST CONTINGENT UPON THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS APPROVING ALL THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUESTS. OKAY WHAT'S THAT? THAT'S THE ACTION THAT'S GIVING YOU BOTH OPTIONS OF WHAT YOU WANT TO DO WITH THIS. EITHER RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL WITH THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS OR RECOMMEND DENIAL TO CITY COUNCIL. OKAY DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY HEARING NONE, THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS NOW 5:37. COMMISSIONERS. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? I'VE GOT JUST AS A FORMER TITLE ATTORNEY, I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED ABOUT THAT ALLEY. WHEN THERE'S AN ALLEY THAT APPEARED ON THE ON PLATS UP UNTIL 68 AND THEN DISAPPEARED, THAT SORT OF SUGGESTS TO ME AN ACTION MIGHT HAVE BEEN TAKEN BY THE COUNCIL TO ABANDON THE ALLEY. WE DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED. WE'VE DONE THE RESEARCH. WE CANNOT FIND WHERE IT WAS EVER VACATED. THE SURVEYOR WENT OUT. THAT PORTION OF THAT INGRESS EGRESS IS COMBINED WITH EVERY ONE OF THOSE LOTS. IT'S PART OF THOSE LOTS. THE PROPERTY IS PART OF THE LOT. HOWEVER THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, AS WELL AS THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR WENT AND MET WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG AND THEY WANT AN ALLEY? THEY WANT THAT INGRESS EGRESS. A LOT OF PEOPLE USE THAT TO ACCESS THEIR PROPERTIES. IT'S PRIVATE, IT'S NOT CITY MAINTAINED THAT'S FINE I DON'T HAVE I DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO WHAT WE'RE DOING. I'M JUST A LITTLE CONFUSED HOW IT CAME TO BE LIKE THIS. THAT'S WHY WE'RE TRYING KNOW IF ANYBODY. DO WE KNOW IF ANYONE DID A TITLE SEARCH AT THE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN RECORDED? PAM, DO YOU WANT TO ANSWER? TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, MASON, IT JUST WASN'T ON THERE ANYMORE. WE DON'T KNOW WHY. IT WAS A RECORDED DOCUMENT, BUT IT JUST FELL OFF. AND THEY DID NOT FIND ANYTHING DURING THE PLANNING PROCESS ON THAT EITHER? NORMALLY, THE SURVEYOR WOULD DO SOME SURVEY IT'S THE ONE THAT IS USED BY THE CITY A LOT AND BY A LOT OF, PEOPLE WHO DO REPLATS HERE. HE DID. HE DID, AS FAR AS I KNOW, DO AS MUCH RESEARCH AS HE COULD FIND ON THAT. WE DO HAVE ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS IF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS STILL OPEN OR IF YOU WANTED TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO HAVE HIM SPEAK, HE IS HERE. HE MAY HAVE SOME HISTORICAL INFORMATION. IF HE HAS SOME HISTORICAL INFORMATION TO SHED LIGHT ON IT, BUT IT'S NOT THAT BIG A DEAL. IT'S JUST A VERY PECULIAR THING, IN MY EXPERIENCE, TO HAVE IT JUST DISAPPEAR ACROSS MULTIPLE LOTS LIKE THAT. I AGREE, MASON THE OLDER DOCUMENT IS NOT A PLAT LIKE WE THINK OF WHAT A PLAT LOOKS LIKE. IT'S MORE OF A SURVEY THAT SHOWS THE EASEMENTS. AND SO THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IT WILL BE PLATTED WITH THE EASEMENTS. IS THIS PART OF THE SOUTH DECATUR EDITION? YES OKAY PARTS OF THE SOUTH DECATUR EDITION ARE LIKE THAT? YES. QUITE A BIT. OKAY, THAT'S REALLY MY ONLY QUESTION. WOULD THIS. SO IT WOULD NOT BE A DEDICATED ALLEY, BUT THE WOULD IT BE OWNED INDIVIDUALLY BY THE [00:10:06] OWNERS ON HATCHER? IT IS IT'S OWNED BY THIS OUT THIS THIS SECTION OF THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY EACH OF THE FOUR PROPERTY OWNERS. OKAY SO THE ONES THAT LIVED ON SOUTH COLLEGE. THEY USE IT. TECHNICALLY THEY COULDN'T IT JUST BE A GENTLEMAN'S AGREEMENT THAT THEY USED IT BASICALLY. IT IT'S AN INGRESS EGRESS EASEMENT THAT'S SUPPOSED TO BE MAINTAINED IN PERPETUITY. IT'S NOT SUPPOSED TO BE CLOSED OFF AT ANY PORTION AT ANY TIME BECAUSE THERE ARE, I BELIEVE, THREE, 2 OR 3 PROPERTIES ALONG COLLEGE. THAT IS THEIR ONLY INGRESS EGRESS TO THEIR PROPERTY IS THROUGH THIS ACCESS EASEMENT. YEAH OKAY SO THE EASEMENT IS. IT'S OWNED BY THE PEOPLE ON HATCHER. RIGHT. OWNED BY ALL FOUR OF THOSE PROPERTIES. IT IS IT IS PART OF THE SURVEY, IT IS PART OF THAT. SO THE PEOPLE ON HATCHER AND THE PEOPLE ON COLLEGE HAVE AND RIGHT TO USE THAT EASEMENT? THEY IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE MAINTAINED OPEN FOR THOSE PEOPLE. ARE WE ARE WE DEDICATING AN ALLEY AS A PART OF THE REPLAT? IT DOESN'T SOUND LIKE IT IS, AN INGRESS EGRESS EASEMENT IT'S BEEN SHOWN AS AN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT THAT ALL ADJOINING OWNERS WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE FOR THAT PURPOSE. YES. OKAY THEY HAVEN'T THE ONES THAT LIVE ON HATCHER HAVE GRANTED AN EASEMENT TO THE ONES THAT LIVE ON COLLEGE SO THEY CAN ACCESS THEIR PROPERTY? IT'S AN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT. SO ANYONE COULD USE IT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS. OKAY WE ALREADY HAVE UTILITIES IN THAT ALLEYWAY OKAY. SO WE'RE DOCUMENTING ALL OF THIS YEAH. AS AS IS OFTEN THE CASE IN THE OLDER PARTS OF DECATUR THERE'S CLEANUP AND CLARIFICATION THAT'S NEEDED AS WE GO FORWARD. OKAY OKAY OKAY HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO EITHER RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL. OH I'M SORRY, IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE? YEAH DO I NEED TO OPEN IT BACK UP? YOU CAN. HE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE PART OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. YOU CAN INVITE HIM UP TO SPEAK ON THIS. COME RIGHT ON UP. NAME AND ADDRESS. VERY GOOD THANK YOU, RICK. WE HAD ISSUES MANY YEARS AGO. THE CORBINS USED TO LIVE IN THAT HOUSE BEHIND ME, OKAY? SO I WENT TO THE COURTHOUSE. THAT IS NOT AN ALLEY. IT'S A BASICALLY A PRIVATE DRIVE. IT USED TO BE JUST SOLID GRASS. AND ON THE RECORDS AT THE COURTHOUSE, IT DON'T SHOW. IT JUST SHOWS GRASS. YOU KNOW WHAT HAD HAPPENED? CORBIN HAD A ROCK TRUCK OR A SEMI. THEY WOULD NOT LET HIM PARK OUT FRONT. SO WHAT HE STARTED DOING WAS DRIVING IN THE BACK ALL THE TIME. AND THAT'S HOW THAT EASEMENT COME ABOUT. HIM DRIVING UP AND DOWN THAT ROAD. WE'RE TALKING I'VE BEEN HERE 46 YEARS AND HE'S BEEN DRIVING WAY BEFORE THEN BECAUSE HE WAS RETIRED WHEN I GOT HERE. SO THAT'S HOW THAT COME ABOUT. NOW WHERE MY FENCE IS FROM MY FENCE BACK, THERE'S 39FT ON ONE SIDE AND 38FT. THAT'S HOW MUCH OF THAT EASEMENT IS ACTUALLY MY PROPERTY AND THE JERNIGAN'S PROPERTY. SO I MEAN, IT'S BEEN A MESS ALL THESE YEARS. THEY'RE TRYING TO STRAIGHTEN IT OUT AND I'VE GOT I'VE HAD THE PLACE HAD BEEN SURVEYED THREE TIMES I KNOW OF I GOT TWO SURVEYS. WOW I'M PAYING TAXES ON ABOUT 2800FT² THAT I CAN'T USE. AND THEY'RE NOT LOWERING TAXES ON IT. I ALWAYS TOLD THEM IF THEY WANT TO PUT AN ALLEY, OKAY, YOU TAKE 10 FEET OFF MINE, THEN YOU TAKE 10 FEET OFF THE PROPERTY BEHIND ME, THEN MAKE AN ALLEY. BUT THEY DON'T WANT TO DO THAT. SO RIGHT NOW IT'S A PRIVATE DRIVE BASICALLY THAT EVERYBODY SHARES IT. VERY GOOD THANK YOU. BUT YOU'RE IN FAVOR OF THIS, CORRECT? YES AS LONG AS WE GET THERE'S MORE STUFF THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO TO FIND THAT OUT WORK PROPERLY IF I CAN MOVE MY FENCE OUT A LITTLE MORE BECAUSE LIKE I SAY, I DON'T NEED 39FT OUT THERE. ALRIGHT RIGHT. YES. THAT'S WHAT IT SOUNDS LIKE. SO WE'RE SUPPOSED TO WORK THAT OUT HERE AND NEXT SEVERAL DAYS. [00:15:05] THANK YOU. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. I ASKED LISA JUST TO PUT UP THE PREVIOUS DOCUMENT FOR YOU TO LOOK AT AGAIN. IT WAS PART OF HER PRESENTATION, BUT THERE IT IS. THIS IS THE ONE THAT SHOWED THAT EASEMENT THAT AFTER THIS POINT, IT WASN'T SHOWN ANYMORE FOR, YOU KNOW, THE LAST WHAT HAS IT BEEN, 60 YEARS? [LAUGHTER] ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL ON ITEM 4. I'LL RECOMMEND APPROVAL. DO I NEED TO ADD IN THERE BASED ON THE OKAY THAT'S MINE WE'VE GOT AN APPROVAL WITH A CONTINGENCY FROM COMMISSIONER TERRY BERUBE. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SHELBY HICKS. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? ITEM 5. WE'RE GOING TO A PUBLIC HEARING IT IS NOW 5:46. [ITEM 5: SUP-25-0005 – Public hearing, discussion, and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding an ordinance to allow a Detached Accessory Dwelling in an SF-2, Single-Family Residential Zoning District, on approximately 0.403 acres of land located at 505 N Lane Street, Decatur, Texas. (Rogelio Delgado) Staff is requesting a continuance to the Dec. 2 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.] LISA? YES, SIR LISA HANNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR. SO THIS IS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE 505 SOUTH LANE STREET. THEY ARE PLANNING ON DOING AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT. IT'S ALREADY THERE. IT JUST HAS TO BE MADE HABITABLE. BUT DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A 30-DAY EXTENSION FOR THE PLATTING, STAFF IS REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT APPLICATION TO THE DECEMBER 2ND MEETING. 4TH LANE OR SOUTH LANE? NORTH OKAY WE MUST STOP SOMETIME SORRY ABOUT THAT [LAUGHTER]. YOU STILL LISTEN SPEAKERS]. WE'RE STILL IN A PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IT IS NOW 5:47. JOHN, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SAY? [LAUGHTER] YES. COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS? HEARING NONE I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION ITEM NUMBER 5. I'VE GOT A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER WILL KLOSE TO APPROVE THE 30-DAY. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. I'VE GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER JOHN LANIER AND EILEEN CROSS [LAUGHTER]. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. GOING INTO SOME NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. [ITEM 6: PP-25-0008 – Consider and take action regarding a 30-day extension request for a Preliminary Plat application for Block A, Lots 1-22, 1X, 2X; Block B, Lots 1- 8, 1X; Block C, Lots 1-20, 1X; Block D, Lots 1-11, 1X; Block E, Lots 1-4, 1X; being 8.496 acres, part of David Moses Survey, Abst. No. 537, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas, also known as 700 S Deer Park Road. (30-day Extension Request) (Nouvelle Terrace Lofts Addition)] ITEM NUMBER 6, LISA. YES, SIR THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE NOUVELLE TERRACE. IT IS ON 700 DEER PARK. THEY HAVE REQUESTED A 30-DAY EXTENSION. THE PLAT RIGHT NOW DOES NOT CONFORM WITH THE APPROVED PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THAT PLAN DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED JUNE OF 2023, WHICH OUTLINES THE LOT SIZES AND LOT COUNTS. SO WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THE PRELIMINARY OR, THE LOT SIZES AND EVERYTHING WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THEIR PD. SO WE'RE. THEY REQUESTED A 30-DAY EXTENSION AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THAT 30-DAY EXTENSION. AGAIN IT WILL BE ON THE DECEMBER 2ND MEETING. NO SPECIAL MEETING IS REQUIRED. COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS? ARE THEY TRYING TO SHRINK THE LOT SIZES FROM THOSE THAT WERE ORIGINALLY APPROVED IN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT? I'M NOT 100% SURE, BUT THIS IS THE TOWNHOME PORTION OF IT. IT'S NOT THE SINGLE FAMILY PORTION OF IT. THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME IS STILL IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT? AS FAR AS I KNOW. CHERYL, DO YOU KNOW, SPEAKERS]. THIS IS JUST FOR THE TOWNHOMES? YES SO THEY'RE MOVING THE GAS LINE. THEY'RE MOVING AWAY FROM THE GAS LINE EASEMENT OR? WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THAT RIGHT NOW I JUST WAS CURIOUS IF THEY WERE TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, CHANGE THINGS UP TOO MUCH. [00:20:01] STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. OF A 30-DAY EXTENSION. WHENEVER YOU'RE READY, I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE 30-DAY APPROVAL. OKAY I'M READY [LAUGHTER]. I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION. OKAY I'VE GOT A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MASON WOODRUFF [LAUGHTER] TO APPROVE. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER EILEEN CROSS FOR THE 30-DAY EXTENSION. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE APPROVED. I MEAN, THOSE DISAPPROVE THANK YOU. MOVING TO ITEM 7. YES, SIR CONSENT AGENDA, WE HAVE THREE ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. [ITEM 7: Consent Agenda Items] IT'S GOING TO BE THE REPLAT FOR. OOPS SORRY, I WENT TOO FAST. REPLAT 2806 SOUTH FM 51 THE CONVENIENCE STORE. FINAL PLAT FOR DEER PARK, THE CHISHOLM APARTMENTS AND FINAL PLAT FOR PALOMA TRAILS, WHICH IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. PALOMA TRAILS THIS IS LIKE PHASE ONE. THERE ARE OTHER PHASES COMING, RIGHT? THIS IS PHASE ONE B, THIS IS SO THIS IS PHASE ONE OF PALOMA. AND DO WE FEEL LIKE THEY'RE STILL WORKING ON THE OTHER PHASES? THIS IS SO WE DID A WE THERE WAS A THIS IS A NEW FINAL PLAT FOR PALOMA. WHAT THEY DID IS THEY CREATED THE COMMERCIAL LOTS AND SPLIT A COMMERCIAL LOT OUT OF THAT AND DEFINED THAT ONE COMMERCIAL LOT. OTHER THAN THAT, I THINK THAT WAS ALL THAT WAS THAT WAS DONE ON THIS FOR A NEW FINAL PLAT. BUT THEY NEEDED TO, TO DO THAT IN ORDER TO SPLIT THOSE COMMERCIAL LOTS. OKAY WELL, THE CHISHOLM TRAIL APARTMENTS ARE ALREADY BUILT, AND WE'RE JUST NOW APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT? THE FINAL PLAT. IT'S ANOTHER NEW FINAL PLAT. THERE WERE SOME EASEMENT CHANGES. OKAY. SOME EASEMENTS HAVE HAD TO BE MOVED RATHER THAN FILING SEPARATE INSTRUMENTS. IT WAS A CLEAN FINAL PLAT COMING FORWARD WITH THIS. JUST CLEANING THINGS UP. YES. DID WE NOT ACCEPT THE FINAL PLAT ON THAT? AND THIS IS BASICALLY RESCINDING AND REDOING IT? BASICALLY, YES, THIS IS THE NEWEST FINAL PLAT. SAME THING WITH THE PALOMA TRAILS. THERE WAS A FINAL PLAT THAT WAS IN FOR THAT WHERE WE'RE REDOING THAT FINAL PLAT ALSO. OKAY THAT WOULD BE THE CORRECT PROCESS. OKAY ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. SEE IF I CAN GET THIS STRAIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO NEED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON ITEM 7.A RP-25-0012. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RP-25-0012. OKAY I'VE GOT A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER WILL KLOSE. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SHELBY HICKS. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED?[LAUGHTER]. OKAY, MOVING TO ITEM 7.B BOY ON FP-25-0007 I NEED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL. I'LL OFFER A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ITEM 7.B. OKAY I'VE GOT FROM A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL ON ITEM 7.B BOY FROM COMMISSIONER MASON WOODRUFF. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER JOHN LANIER. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? AND ITEM 7.C AS IN CHARLIE FP-25-0008. I NEED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. I'VE GOT A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER JOHN LANIER. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER WILL KLOSE. ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. MOVING TO ITEM 8, LISA. [ITEM 8: Discussion of future agenda, new business items, staff requests, and potential special-called meeting and/or workshop requests: a. As of the agenda posting, the Tuesday, December 2, 2025, meeting currently has seven (7) new Planning applications. The submittal deadline is November 3, 2025, at 5:00 p.m.] WELL ITEM OKAY. ITEM 8 ANOTHER TYPO ON MY END. OUR FUTURE MEETING. OUR NEXT MEETING IS DECEMBER 2ND. [00:25:02] WHEN THIS WAS DONE, WE ONLY HAD 5 AGENDA ITEMS. WE HAVE 10 NOW, SO IT'LL BE A BUSY MEETING INCLUDING THE ONES THAT WE'RE PUSHING BACK? AND INCLUDES THE ONES WE'RE PUSHING BACK YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. OKAY, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISH TO GET UP AND DANCE? OKAY, IF NOT, THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS MEETING IS NOW 5:55. THANK YOU, EVERYBODY, FOR COMING. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.