[CALL TO ORDER AND ANNOUNCE A QUORUM]
[00:00:05]
WE DO HAVE A QUORUM, AND WE'RE GOING TO PROCEED TO ITEM NUMBER 1.
[ITEM 1: Consider and take appropriate action regarding the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes from September 2, 2025.]
CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING THE APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER THE 2ND OF 2025.COMMISSIONERS DO Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? ANY CONCERNS? DO Y'ALL EVEN REMEMBER? OUR MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER THE 2ND OKAY, OKAY.
VERY GOOD, VERY GOOD. WELL, THEN I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN.
SO MOVED. OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION TO ACCEPT FROM COMMISSIONER.
WILL KLOSE. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER EILEEN CROSS.
ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. OKAY.
[ITEM 2: CP-25-0003 – Public hearing, discussion, and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding an ordinance to amend the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Map to change the following land use designations from Estate Living (EL) to Compact Neighborhood (CN) on an approximately 0.422-acre tract of land situated in the HD Donald Survey, Abstract No. 1158, Wise County, Texas, and being part of called 1.205 acre tract of land described in a warranty deed to American Tower Management, Inc., recorded in Volume 946, Page 311, Deed Records of Wise County, Texas. (Paloma Trails) ]
GOING IN TO ITEM 2, WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.SO THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS NOW OPEN AT 531.
SO THIS ITEM IS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 25-0003.
SECOND. SO THIS IS THE SECOND OF 3 APPLICATIONS RELATED TO THAT ANNEXATION.
WE HAVE TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE ON THAT.
THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE GIVES US THE PROCESS FOR LAND USE AMENDMENTS.
CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE THE RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNEXATION AUGUST 11TH, AND TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ANNEXATION OF THAT RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT AWAY IS TO BE DEDICATED AND DEEDED TO THE CITY OF DECATUR. PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED, 9 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED.
WE HAD NO FORMAL RESPONSES. WE HAD 1 PHONE CALL INQUIRY.
THE CURRENT USE IS A STATE LIVING AND IT WILL BE CHANGED TO COMPACT NEIGHBORHOOD TO ALIGN WITH THE PALOMA TRAILS DEVELOPMENT AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF CP25-0003. WE'RE HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THE AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE? JOSEPH, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE THAT.OKAY. SO IF THERE'S NO ONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK.
THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED. IT IS. 5:33 COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND CONCERNS.
I DO NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. I'VE GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SHELBY HICKS.
ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
[ITEM 3: PD-25-0003 – Public hearing, discussion, and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding an ordinance to amend the City’s Zoning Ordinance and official Zoning Map to change the existing zoning designation from Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) to Planned Development (PD) on an approximately 0.422-acre tract of land situated in the HD Donald Survey, Abstract No. 1158, Wise County, Texas, and being part of called 1.205 acre tract of land described in a warranty deed to American Tower Management, Inc., recorded in Volume 946, Page 311, Deed Records of Wise County, Texas. (Paloma Trails)]
OKAY. GOING TO PUBLIC HEARING, ITEM NUMBER 3.WE'RE GOING TO OPEN IT UP. IT IS NOW 5:34. LISA.
05:34 AND 15 SECONDS. OKAY. THANK YOU. SORRY. ITEM 3 IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 20 5-0003. THIS IS THE REZONING REQUEST. OUR 3RD AND FINAL APPLICATION RELATED TO THE ANNEXATION FOR THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR PALOMA TRAILS.
SO REZONING OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION WILL BE MONDAY, OCTOBER 13TH AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
THE RIGHT OF WAY IS TO BE DEDICATED AND DEEDED TO THE CITY OF DECATUR.
AGAIN, WE NOTIFIED 9 PROPERTY OWNERS. NO RESPONSES ON THIS ONE.
IT IS EXISTING. IT'S IN THE ETJ. THAT'S THE EXISTING ZONING, AND IT WILL BE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO FALL IN LINE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE PALOMA TRAILS PROPERTY. AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF PD-25-0003.
[00:05:01]
WE'RE HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE WISHING TO SAY ANYTHING? OKAY. HEARING NONE, THEN I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.IT IS NOW 5:35. COMMISSIONERS. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS.
CONCERNS. I HAVE A NITPICKY QUESTION. AS A FORMER REAL ESTATE LAWYER, WHEN YOU USE THE TERM DEDICATED AND DEEDED AS RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CITY OF DECATUR, THOSE ARE SORT OF 2 DIFFERENT THINGS.
ARE WE TALKING IS THE CITY GOING TO ACTUALLY ACQUIRE TITLE TO THIS LITTLE STRIP, OR IS IT JUST BEING DEDICATED AS A RIGHT OF WAY? I DON'T I DON'T CARE. I'M JUST CURIOUS WHEN YOU USE THAT TERMINOLOGY.
IT'S TELLING ME 2 DIFFERENT THINGS. IF IT'S LIKE ANY STREET ON A PLAT, IS DEDICATED THAT'S NOT DEEDED TO THE CITY, THAT'S JUST DEDICATED AS A RIGHT OF WAY. IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING FROM THE APPLICANT THAT THEY ARE GOING TO DEED THAT OVER TO THE CITY.
I COULD BE WRONG, SO I'LL DEFER THAT TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY.
EITHER WAY IS FINE WITH ME. IT DOESN'T MAKE. CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME? GO AHEAD.
CAN YOU HEAR ME? YES. YES. THEY'RE GOING TO DEED IT, MASON.
THEY'RE GOING TO DEED IT TO US. YES. OKAY. INTERESTING.
I'LL OFFER A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM TO THE CITY.
A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER MASON WOODRUFF.
I DO NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND FROM SHORT TIMER.
COMMISSIONER TERRY BERUBE. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE.
[ITEM 4: SI-25-0003 – Public hearing, discussion, and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Decatur, Texas, Amending Appendix “A,” “Decatur Subdivision Ordinance,” Appendix I – “Design Standards,” Chapter 1. – “Design Criteria,” Section 107, “Landscape Design,” Subsection 107.6, “Xeriscaping Requirements,” providing for updated regulations and requirements related to Xeriscaping.]
GOING BACK INTO PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM 4. WE'RE GOING TO OPEN IT UP.IT IS NOW 5:37. LISA. YES, SIR. LISA HANNON, PLANNING DIRECTOR, WILL ENTER OUR STAFF REPORT INTO THE RECORD BY REFERENCE IN ITS ENTIRETY. SO THIS IS OUR XERISCAPING AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION CODE.
STAFF BROUGHT THIS FORWARD AS A DISCUSSION ITEM A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
WE'VE WORKED DILIGENTLY TO TRY TO GET THE ORDINANCE IN PLACE.
SO CURRENTLY XERISCAPING IS ONLY PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS.
OF COURSE, PRINCIPLES ARE FOR WATER CONSERVATION, SOIL IMPROVEMENT TO HELP DEVELOPERS USE NATIVE SPECIES AND DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES FOR SUSTAINABLE MAINTENANCE. THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, SECTION 580-002 DOES ALLOW MUNICIPALITIES TO CONSIDER ENACTING XERISCAPE ORDINANCES AND REQUIRING THE USE OF XERISCAPE TO HELP CONSERVE WATER.
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES THAT STAFF HAS IMPLEMENTED IS ADDING DEFINITIONS INTO THIS SECTION OF THE SUBDIVISION CODE, ADDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR IRRIGATION AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION TO PERMIT IT IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS WITH CERTAIN REGULATIONS, WE ADDED A TABLE OF PERMITTED TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER THAT FALL IN LINE WITH THE XERISCAPING FROM THE STATE OF TEXAS.
SO UNDER RESIDENTIAL XERISCAPE REQUIREMENT, WE ARE.
IT'S A MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA WHICH CAN BE DEVELOPED AND HAS TO BE DEVOTED TO TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPING BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT ALL SOLID ROCK, ALL SOLID SHELL OR ANYTHING BECAUSE THAT ATTRACTS HEAT.
IT'S NOT REALLY GOOD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT EITHER.
SO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX DWELLINGS HAVE 35% HAS TO BE TRADITIONAL LANDSCAPE, MULTIFAMILY 30%. ARTIFICIAL TURF SHOULD BE LIMITED TO 40% OF ANY OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREA AND SETBACK AREA NONRESIDENTIAL, WE'RE LETTING THEM HAVE A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBILITY WITH THIS.
ONLY 10% FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND LIKE SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, PHILANTHROPIC 20%.
AGAIN, THESE ARE RECOMMENDATIONS. THIS IS NOT ADOPTED YET.
WE'RE ASKING FOR YOUR INPUT WHEN WE MOVE THIS FORWARD TO COUNCIL AND ARTIFICIAL TURF LIMITED TO 50% OF ANY REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AND SETBACK AREA ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS, WHILE THE LITTLE ASTERISK IS THERE, MAY APPLY TO PROJECTS THAT ARE ZONED AS PART OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE THEY CAN WRITE IN THEIR OWN LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE PD PROCESS.
SO. GROUND COVER. ALL DEVELOPMENT IS REQUIRED TO HAVE GROUND COVER.
[00:10:01]
WITH SUITABLE GROUND COVERS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SOD ORGANIC MULCH, PLANTING BEDS.NO EXPOSED SOIL SHALL BE PERMITTED BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT RUNOFF.
YOU DON'T WANT DUST BOWLS. ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
ALL GROUND COVERS MUST BE MAINTAINED AT A HEIGHT OF 12IN OR BELOW AT ALL TIMES.
BUT WE'RE OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
THANK YOU LISA. DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? HEARING NONE. THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING MEETING. IT IS NOW 5:41 COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS.
THIS DOESN'T CHANGE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE NUMBER OF TREES, DOES IT? NO. OKAY. THAT'S POSSIBLY COMING FORWARD LATER.
UPDATING THAT. NO. OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT ARTIFICIAL TURF AND HOW LONG THAT LASTS.
AND IF IT BREAKS DOWN, IS THERE GOING TO BE SOME REQUIREMENT TO REMOVE THE ARTIFICIAL TURF? THERE WILL BE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS PUT IN THERE.
USUALLY IT'S A 8 TO 10 YEAR WARRANTY AND WE WOULD REQUIRE THE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF, A CERTAIN WEIGHTING. WE DON'T ALLOW THE RUBBER INFILL MATERIAL TO HELP IT STAND UP.
THAT WAY, WHEN THE DOGS DO THEIR BUSINESS, IT DOESN'T GROW BACTERIA.
THERE'S A CERTAIN TYPE OF SAND INFILL THAT YOU CAN USE THAT'S BACTERIA RESISTANT.
OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? PAM, WE DO NEED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON THIS TO MOVE IT FORWARD.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. IS THAT CORRECT? YES, SIR.
OKAY. I JUST HAVE A COMMENT, I GUESS, ABOUT ARTIFICIAL TURF, BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE IT'S, OH, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE RIGHT WORD I WANT TO SAY IS.
IT'S NOT NATURAL. AND AT SOME POINT BECOMES GARBAGE.
YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T LAST LIKE GRASS OR DIRT.
SO I HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF AN ISSUE WITH HAVING A BUNCH OF ARTIFICIAL TURF.
I UNDERSTAND IT'S TO SAVE WATER, BUT IT CREATES OTHER ISSUES.
SO I'M A LITTLE HESITANT ON THAT. THAT'S JUST MY COMMENT.
AND WE CAN ADD ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS IN THERE FOR THAT.
JUST SPEAKING FROM EXPERIENCE FROM FLORIDA, WE ADDED THE ARTIFICIAL TURF INTO OUR ORDINANCE, AND WE HAD ALL OF THOSE REQUIREMENTS. WE HAD TO HAVE IT HAD TO HAVE A CERTAIN PERCENT WEIGHTED.
IF IT WAS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, THEY HAD TO SIGN A HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT BECAUSE IF ANY WORK WAS DONE IN A DRAINAGE RIGHT OF WAY, IT WAS NOT THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPLACE IT.
YOU WANT IT TO HAVE SUFFICIENT DRAINAGE AS WELL.
WE CAN ADD A LOT OF THAT IN THERE. IF YOU WANT TO TAKE IT OUT NOW AND TRY TO ADD IT LATER AS WE GO.
WE'RE HAPPY TO DO THAT AS WELL. WE'RE LOOKING FOR THE RECOMMENDATIONS.
ABSOLUTELY. OKAY. NOW WE'VE GOT A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL.
BUT BEFORE WE VOTE ON THAT, DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY MORE COMMENTS? WHAT ARE THE YOU SAID YOU HAVE A TABLE OF GROUND COVER, JUST DIFFERENT GRAVELS.
IS IT JUST DESCRIBED DIFFERENT GRAVELS OR. NO.
THESE ARE LIVING GROUND COVERS. THESE ARE OKAY.
THESE ARE LIVING PLANT GROUND COVERS THAT. BUT GRAVEL IS ALSO DIFFERENT.
[00:15:05]
GRAVELS ARE LIKE BASALT AND AND RIVER ROCK AND DIFFERENT THINGS.THOSE THOSE ARE ALSO ACCEPTABLE. THAT IS CORRECT.
YEAH. OKAY. SO WE'RE NOT. SO THAT'S ALREADY IN THE IN.
WELL YOU CAN HAVE OR YOU CAN HAVE INORGANIC INORGANIC MULCHING AND GROUND COVER.
BUT WE ADDED THE, THE LIVING GROUND COVER WITH WHETHER IT'S NATIVE OR NON-NATIVE, HOW TALL IT GROWS, THE SPACING AND THINGS LIKE THAT. RECOMMENDED OFF THE STATE OF TEXAS, 1 OF THE AGRICULTURAL SITES FOR XERISCAPING.
AND CECIL. YOU HAD SAID THAT YOU HAD A MOTION, BUT YOU DON'T YET HAVE A MOTION ON THIS.
I'M FIXING TO CORRECT THAT. OKAY. I DID SAY THAT.
I DID SAY THAT THERE WAS A MOTION MADE. THE VERBIAGE IS SHOULD BE I THINK IS I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL ON THIS ITEM. I'LL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL AS I GUESS AS PRESENTED.
AND THEN I'VE GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MASON WOODRUFF.
ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. OPPOSED? PAM, DID THAT WORK? YES, SIR. YOU DID GREAT. YOU ALWAYS DO. THANK YOU.
[ITEM 5: Consent Agenda Items]
OKAY. MOVING TO ITEM 5. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. LISA, WE HAVE 2 CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. ITEM 5.A FINAL PLAT 25-0006.IT'S FOR 1801 SOUTH TRINITY DECATUR OFFICE VILLAGE.
IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION. AND THEN WE HAVE 5.B.
REPLAT 25-0011 100 SOUTH WASHBURN. AND I BELIEVE THAT IS ALL VACANT OR CLOSE TO BEING VACANT.
SO THE STATION 100 IS A STATION. ON THE MEDICAL PLAZA. ARE THERE ANY SETBACKS ENFORCED? BETWEEN THE LOTS. IS THERE ANY LIKE IT WOULD BE WITH THE SEPARATE PROPERTY? AND MY CONCERN IS THE WAY THEY'RE DIVIDED, THEY COULD BE SOLD INDIVIDUALLY AS A SEPARATE BUSINESS.
AND I WONDERED IF. WELL, IF THERE IF THEY'RE LIKE CONDOMINIUM SIZED THEY COULD SELL INDIVIDUAL.
BUT I DON'T I DON'T SEE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SELL THE LOTS IF THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET SETBACKS, OR THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE VARIANCE PROCESS. IF THEY HAVE BUILDINGS ACROSS THE LOT LINE, THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO THAT. OKAY. 1 LOT.
IT IS ONE ENTIRE LOT WITH SEVERAL BUILDINGS ON IT.
OKAY. IT WOULD BE A WHOLE LOT IF THEY WANTED TO, IF THEY WANTED TO SUBDIVIDE IT INTO SEPARATE LOTS FOR THE SEPARATE BUILDINGS, THEN THERE'D BE A PROBLEM. AND THAT'S WHEN THE SETBACK AND I`` HAD A SIMILAR QUESTION. SO ON THE CORNER IT LOOKS LIKE IT COULD BE SEPARATED FROM THE OTHER 2 AND SOLD INDIVIDUALLY.
THE LOT THE ONE ON THE BOTTOM ON THE SOUTH SIDE, IT APPEARS IT WOULD BE LANDLOCKED WHERE YOU COULDN'T SELL IT, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE IT KIND OF COULD BE DIVIDED IN HALF AND SELL 1 HALF AND RETAIN OR SELL THE OTHER HALF TO ANOTHER BUYER? NO, THEY'RE COMBINING EVERYTHING TOGETHER UNDER 1 LOT.
SO THAT'S WHAT THE PLATTING IS FOR, IS TO BRING IT ALL UNDER AND THEY'RE BRINGING IT BACK TO 1 LOT. OKAY. OH, OKAY.
I TOTALLY MISSED THAT. I THOUGHT THEY WERE. I MISREAD IT TOO.
YEAH, I'M RIGHT WITH JOHN. I THOUGHT IT WAS GOING THE OTHER WAY. THEY WERE DIVIDING 1 INTO 3.
OKAY. BUT SINCE THERE WAS DISCUSSION ON THAT, PLEASE TAKE THESE BOTH INDIVIDUALLY.
I'M SORRY, WE DIDN'T HEAR. SHE WANTS YOU TO VOTE ON BOTH OF THESE INDIVIDUALLY.
OKAY. OKAY. SO I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL TO CITY COUNCIL ON FP 25-0006. THAT'S THE STATION. NO THAT'S THE VILLAGE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
OKAY. I'VE GOT A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER WILL KLOSE.
I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. GOT A SECOND? FROM COMMISSIONER TERRY BERUBE.
[00:20:06]
ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. I'LL NEED A ENTERTAIN.A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF CITY COUNCIL ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEM B, RP25-0011. CHAD HARVEY.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. [LAUGHTER] ON BEHALF OF CHAD.
APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER WILL KLOSE. I GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER JOHN LANIER.
ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.
[ITEM 6: Discussion of future agenda, new business items, staff requests, and potential specialcalled meeting and/or workshop requests: a. As of the agenda posting, the WEDNESDAY, November 5, 2025, meeting currently has five (5) new Planning applications. The submittal deadline is October 6, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. (If there is a meeting, the meeting will be an in-person meeting with potential virtual attendance of staff and members of the public unless otherwise determined.)]
ITEM 6. LISA. YES, SIR. AS OF YESTERDAY, WE HAVE.I THINK IT'S 5. IT MIGHT EVEN BE 6 ITEMS. THEY KEEP COMING IN FOR OUR MEETING ON NOVEMBER 5TH.
AND REMEMBER, THAT IS A WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5TH, BECAUSE ELECTION DAY IS NOVEMBER 4TH.
OKAY. THAT IS IT FOR US TONIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR ANYTHING? OKAY. HEARING NONE. THEN I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS P&Z MEETING.
IT IS NOW 5:51. THANK YOU.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.