2. RECEIVE PRESENTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN REGARDING THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMISSION (CIAC).

[2. RECEIVE PRESENTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN REGARDING THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMISSION (CIAC).]

ANDREW. GOOD EVENING.

GREAT TO BE BACK IN FRONT OF YOU ALL AGAIN.

SO TONIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT.

THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE IMPACT FEES THAT ARE CURRENTLY ONGOING.

SO THIS IS REALLY A PART ONE OF TWO PRESENTATION.

SO BACK IN DECEMBER WE'LL BE BACK IN FRONT OF YOU WITH REALLY THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY.

AND FOR ACTUAL FORMAL ADOPTION OF THE STUDY.

WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT IS JUST THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

AND AT THE END OF THAT, WE'LL BE OPEN FOR QUESTIONS AND ULTIMATELY A RESOLUTION.

IF YOU ALSO CHOOSE FOR PASSING THOSE A LITTLE BIT MORE CONTEXT.

IF YOU RECALL, BACK IN OCTOBER, WE WERE I WAS ALSO BACK IN FRONT OF YOU ALL TO TALK ABOUT THE WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE, PARTICULARLY THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT, WASTEWATER AND WATER TREATMENT PLANTS, WHICH WILL BE A PART OF THIS.

SO MAYBE THIS IS PROBABLY PART TWO OF THREE OF PRESENTATIONS.

SO TONIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO TALK ABOUT WHAT OUR IMPACT FEES.

JUST A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF WHAT ARE THEY WHAT'S THEIR PURPOSE.

THE IMPACT FEE COMPONENT.

SO WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT STEPS WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH IN CALCULATING THEM.

AND THEN FINALLY WHAT ARE THE ACTIONS AND NEXT STEPS FOR THIS BODY.

SO FOR WHAT OUR IMPACT FEES IT'S A ONE TIME FEE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT.

IT IS NOT APPLIED TO YOUR EXISTING CUSTOMERS.

IT'S ONLY APPLIED TO NEW DEVELOPMENT COMING INTO THE CITY.

AND IT ONLY HAPPENS ONCE.

IT'S NOT AN ONGOING RATE THAT HAPPENS ON A MONTHLY OR ANNUAL BASIS AND REALLY WHAT IT IS.

IT WAS DEVELOPED AS A MECHANISM FOR THE CITY TO RECOVER THE INFRASTRUCTURE COST TO SERVE THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT COMING IN WHENEVER THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT COMES IN.

WE HAVE TO BUILD WATER AND WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE.

WE HAVE TO BUILD ROADS.

SO, IT'S A WAY IT'S A LEGAL WAY THAT THE STATE DEVELOPED FOR CITIES TO BE ABLE TO RECOUP THOSE COSTS IN ORDER TO SUPPORT THAT NEW GROWTH.

SO WHAT ARE IMPACT FEES? THE CITY CAN'T USE THEM.

THOSE DOLLARS THAT ARE COLLECTED FOR ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING THAT THEY WANT.

IT'S REALLY IT'S DOLLARS THAT GO TOWARDS ONLY SUPPORTING FOR NEW GROWTH.

AND SO THAT CAN BE ANYTHING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEERING FEES ASSOCIATED WITH IT, LAND ACQUISITION AND EVEN THE DEBT AND PLANNING SERVICES TO FINANCE AND PLAN THOSE PROJECTS. THE CITY CANNOT USE THAT FOR OPERATIONAL COSTS, FOR REHABBING EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE, ANYTHING TO DO WITH WHAT'S ALREADY THERE.

THE DOLLARS CAN ONLY BE SPENT ON NEW INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THAT NEW GROWTH.

SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE DIFFERENT IMPACT COMPONENTS, THERE'S REALLY FIVE DIFFERENT BUCKETS.

IT'S THE SERVICE AREAS.

WHAT'S THE AREA WE'RE ASSESSING IT THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS.

HOW MUCH ARE WE GOING TO GROW THE SERVICE UNITS.

AND I'LL TALK THROUGH HOW DO WE DEFINE WHAT A SERVICE UNIT IS AND HOW DO WE DEFINE A USER, IF YOU WILL, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

SO THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THAT NEW GROWTH.

AND THEN FINALLY WHAT THE MAXIMUM FEE IS GOING TO BE.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE'LL VISIT ON IN DECEMBER.

SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT SERVICE AREAS IT'S REALLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE WE, AS PART OF THE STUDY, HAVE TO DEFINE WHAT THE SERVICE AREA IS.

AND THAT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE CITY IS ONLY ALLOWED TO SPEND DOLLARS WITHIN THAT SERVICE AREA.

IF AFTER THE STUDY IS COMPLETED, LET'S SAY A PROJECT OR A NEW DEVELOPMENT POPS UP OUTSIDE THAT SERVICE AREA, THAT PROJECT IS INELIGIBLE BECAUSE IT'S NOT WITHIN THE SERVICE AREA.

WE WOULD HAVE TO REDO THE STUDY TO MAKE IT ELIGIBLE.

TYPICALLY FOR WATER AND SEWER, IT'S CITYWIDE.

WE TYPICALLY JUST HAVE ONE BIG SERVICE AREA, OR IN THIS CASE IT'S THE ETJ, BECAUSE WE ARE GROWING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS ON THE ROADWAY SIDE.

IT'S A LITTLE BIT INTERESTING IS THAT THE STATE LIMITS YOU TO A SIX MILE LIMIT BASICALLY.

AND SO, IF IN YOUR CASE YOU DON'T EXCEED THE SIX MILE LIMIT, BUT IF YOU ARE LARGE ENOUGH AND YOU DID, YOU WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO HAVE MULTIPLE SERVICE AREAS.

BUT IN THIS CASE YOU JUST HAVE ONE SERVICE AREA.

[00:15:02]

AND THEN ALSO IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE IT DOES.

IT CAN ONLY BE LIMITED BY LAW TO THE CITY LIMITS.

IT CANNOT EXTEND INTO THE ETJ.

SO YOU'LL NOTICE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, YOU MIGHT ASK WHY ARE SOME PROJECTS NOT ON THERE? AND YOU'LL NOTICE IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY, IT'S CHOPPED AT THE CURRENT CITY LIMITS LINE.

AND ANNEXED LAND IN THAT IS THEN CONSIDERED IN THE CITY LIMITS.

CORRECT. SO WE WOULD HAVE TO REDO THE, YOU KNOW, WHENEVER WE UPDATE THE STUDY, WHICH IS REQUIRED EVERY FIVE YEARS IT WOULD GET THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE NEW SERVICE AREA.

BUT THAT SERVICE AREA IS KIND OF FROZEN IN TIME AT THE TIME OF THE STUDY.

OKAY, SO YOU'RE A LITTLE BIT MORE RESTRICTED ON THE ROADWAY SIDE THAN WATER AND SEWER.

JUST A VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF WHAT THIS LOOKS LIKE, WHICH YOU'RE ALL FAMILIAR WITH.

YOU'VE GOT THE CITY LIMITS LINE, WHICH IS, AS I MENTIONED, FOR ROADWAY, AND THEN THE ETJ LINE IS FOR WATER AND SEWER.

SO WE OBVIOUSLY PICK VERY KNOWN AND EASILY IDENTIFIABLE BOUNDARIES FOR THE SERVICE AREA.

SO LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS.

SO WE NEED TO MAKE SOME PROJECTIONS ON HOW MUCH GROWTH IS GOING TO HAPPEN WITHIN THE STUDY, WITHIN THE CITY IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

AND SO THE STATE LAW FOR DICTATING IMPACT FEES BASICALLY GOVERNS YOU TO ONLY TEN YEARS.

SO FOR GROWTH FOR PROJECTS, WE CAN ONLY LOOK AT TEN YEARS.

AND THEN YOU'RE REQUIRED TO UPDATE THE STUDY EVERY FIVE YEARS.

AND WE BASICALLY TAKE THAT TEN YEAR WINDOW AND KEEP SLIDING IT FORWARD.

NOW YOU CAN LET'S SAY, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH THESE ALL THE ASSUMPTIONS WE'RE MAKING OR PROJECTIONS AS PART OF THE STUDY.

IF SOMETHING WERE TO CHANGE DRASTICALLY AND WE SAID, HEY, THAT'S WAY OFF SOME NEW DEVELOPMENT, SOMETHING DRASTICALLY CHANGED.

YOU CAN DO YOU CAN UPDATE THE STUDY AS FREQUENTLY AS YOU WANT, BUT YOU HAVE TO DO IT EVERY FIVE YEARS AT A MINIMUM.

SO AS I MENTIONED, LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ARE WHAT BASICALLY WHAT ARE WE LOOKING AT FOR POPULATION AND WHAT ARE WE LOOKING AT FOR EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS OF GROWTH WITHIN THE NEXT TEN YEARS. SO AS WE BREAK THAT DOWN, BOTH IN A MAP AND A TABLE FORM, IF YOU LOOK ON THE MAP, ALL THOSE GREEN AREAS ARE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE NOT SPECIFIC TO A SINGLE PARCEL, BUT THEY'RE AREAS OF THE CITY THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED, BOTH WITH THE STAFF'S ASSISTANCE OF WHERE NEW DEVELOPMENT IS PROJECTED TO OCCUR.

SO KIND OF KEEPING A PACE ON WHO'S COMING INTO THE CITY, WHO'S TALKING TO THE CITY ABOUT INTEREST, YOU KNOW, INTEREST.

THAT'S WHERE THOSE GREEN AREAS KIND OF GENERALLY SHOW WHERE WE'RE EXPECTING DEVELOPMENT.

AND WHEN YOU ACTUALLY BOIL THAT DOWN INTO WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE IN TERMS OF POPULATION AND DWELLING UNITS? YOU CAN SEE IN THE CITY LIMITS, WE'RE ANTICIPATING APPROXIMATELY 3500 NEW UNITS WORTH OF GROWTH, EQUATING TO ABOUT 8500 PEOPLE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS.

AND THEN WHAT WOULD BE THE ETJ? ABOUT A LITTLE OVER 10,000 PEOPLE IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

SO PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL AND SIGNIFICANT DEPARTURE, PROBABLY FROM THE RATE OF GROWTH HISTORICALLY SEEN.

BUT AS I'M SURE YOU ALL ARE WELL AWARE, THE RATE OF DEVELOPMENT IS PICKING UP.

CERTAINLY. SO ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT BEFORE I MOVE ON? NO, I DON'T BELIEVE SO.

THANK YOU. SO WHENEVER WE TALK ABOUT THIS GROWTH WE NOW NEED TO BOIL IT DOWN INTO SOMETHING STANDARDIZED.

SO WHEN SOMEONE SHOWS UP WITH A HOUSE WE HAVE A WAY TO KIND OF ASSESS IT IN A VERY APPLES TO APPLES AND STANDARD KIND OF WAY.

AND SO ON THE WATER WASTEWATER SIDE, IT'S VERY EASY TO DO THAT WITH JUST A STANDARD WATER METER.

SO YOUR STANDARD WATER METER IS A THREE QUARTER INCH.

YOU KNOW, A TYPICAL HOUSE IN THE CITY THAT'S THE SMALLEST SIZE.

AND THEN IF YOU'VE GOT A BIGGER DEVELOPMENT FOR AN APARTMENT OR A COMMERCIAL OR AN INDUSTRY, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A LARGER SIZE.

AND I'LL GO OVER THAT SIZE OF METER WILL BASICALLY SCALE THEIR IMPACT FEE OR THE IMPACT ON THEIR SYSTEM.

ON THE ROADWAY SIDE, WE UTILIZE SOMETHING CALLED VEHICLE MILES, AND THAT'S BASICALLY A ONE VEHICLE TRAVELING ONE MILE IS AND I'LL GO THROUGH A LITTLE BIT AN EXAMPLE TO KIND OF ILLUSTRATE THAT. BUT THOSE ARE THE SERVICE UNITS THAT ARE STANDARD ACROSS THE STATE FOR DOING IMPACT FEES.

SO ON THE WATER SIDE, JUST TO ILLUSTRATE A LITTLE BIT MORE, SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE USES A THREE QUARTER INCH METER.

A SHOPPING CENTER MIGHT USE A TWO INCH METER, LET'S SAY.

AND SO BASICALLY WHAT THAT WOULD EQUATE TO IS A TWO INCH METER IS EQUIVALENT TO EIGHT OF THOSE THREE QUARTER METERS.

SO WHENEVER WE GET TO THE RATE OF WHAT A SINGLE HOUSE NEEDS TO PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE OF IMPACT ON THE WATER SYSTEM, THAT SHOPPING CENTER WOULD NEED TO PAY EIGHT TIMES THAT WHEN THEY COME ONTO THE SYSTEM.

ON THE ROADWAY SIDE, AS I MENTIONED, IT'S A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.

BUT BASICALLY, WHAT WE DO IS WE USE SOME STANDARDIZED REFERENCE MANUALS TO COME UP.

WHAT IS WHAT IS THE NUMBER OF VEHICLE MILES THAT A DIFFERENT LAND USE MIGHT USE ON YOUR ROADWAY SYSTEM.

AND SO IF YOU TAKE THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME AS AN EXAMPLE, THE AVERAGE HOME WILL MAKE 0.94 TRIPS PER HOME.

AND YOU SEE IN PARENTHESES.

THAT'S THE STANDARD THAT WE'RE REFERRING TO.

AGAIN, TRYING TO KEEP IT STANDARDIZED CITY TO CITY, STATE TO STATE.

[00:20:03]

AND THEN FOR EVERY TRIP THAT THEY DO MAKE, IT'S BASICALLY 4.9 MILES.

AND SO WHEN YOU MULTIPLY THOSE OUT YOU GET 4.61 VEHICLE MILES PER HOUSE.

AND THEN WHEN YOU LOOK AT SOMETHING LIKE A SHOPPING CENTER, YOU CAN SEE THE MATH IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT, BUT YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S MORE TRIPS, AS YOU MIGHT EXPECT FOR A SHOPPING CENTER, BUT THEY DO IT IN THINGS LIKE SQUARE FEET AS OPPOSED TO A SINGLE HOME.

AND THEN YOU CAN SEE THE MILES PER TRIP IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.

SO ON THE WATER WASTEWATER SIDE, WE REALLY JUST BOIL IT DOWN TO WATER METERS FOR THE ROADWAY SIDE.

BASICALLY, AT THE END OF THE STUDY, WE DEVELOP A EXCEL TABLE THAT HAS TENS, IF NOT HUNDREDS OF DIFFERENT LAND USES IN IT SO THAT WHENEVER A DEVELOPMENT COMES IN, WE'RE ABLE TO ACTUALLY STAFF IS ABLE TO SELECT IT'S A SHOPPING CENTER THIS MANY SQUARE FEET.

SO HERE'S THEIR CALCULATED IMPACT ON THE SYSTEM.

OKAY. SO NEXT BUCKET IS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

SO WE TALKED ABOUT HOW MUCH GROWTH IS COMING INTO THE CITY IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS.

AND THEN WE NEED TO NOW FIGURE OUT WHAT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS DO WE NEED TO BUILD TO SERVE THAT ONCOMING POPULATION.

AND SO THAT TYPICALLY COMES FROM YOUR MASTER PLAN.

SO YOUR WATER AND WASTEWATER MASTER PLANS HELPED INFORM THESE CAPITAL PLANS THAT WE DEVELOPED.

AND THEN YOU HAVE AN ADOPTED MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN THAT AGAIN INFORMS THIS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

AND AGAIN, JUST AS A REMINDER, IT IS INCLUSIVE OF EVERYTHING IN ADDITION TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING DESIGN, LEGAL, THE FISCAL RIGHT OF WAY, PROPERTY PURCHASE.

IT INCLUDES ALL OF THAT.

AND THEN IT IS WORTH NOTING THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS IMPACT FEE, THIS CIP, WHICH IS THE IMPACT FEE CIP AND YOUR TRADITIONAL CIP.

YOU KNOW, YOU MIGHT HAVE A FIVE YEAR CIP THAT SAYS, HERE'S ALL THE PROJECTS WE'RE GOING TO LOOK TO ACCOMPLISH AS A CITY OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.

AND THEY MIGHT INCLUDE IMPACT FEE PROJECTS, BUT THEY MIGHT INCLUDE OTHER PROJECTS AS WELL.

THE IMPACT FEE CIP, AGAIN, IS JUST FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT, SO IT SHOULD PROBABLY HAVE SLIGHTLY LESS PROJECTS ON IT THAN YOUR FULL BLOWN FIVE YEAR CIP.

AND THEN AS JUST AS A REMINDER, IT IS INCLUSIVE NOT ONLY OF FUTURE PROJECTS, BUT OF PROJECTS THAT ARE UNDERWAY AND EVEN PROJECTS THAT ARE ALREADY CONSTRUCTED.

SO THE BEST EXAMPLE IS TAKE YOUR NEW WATER TOWER OVER ON THOMPSON.

YOU KNOW, WHENEVER WE BUILT IT, WE DIDN'T BUILD IT JUST TO MEET TODAY'S DEMAND.

WE BUILT IT TO MEET THE NEXT 10 OR 25 YEARS.

SO TODAY WHEN IT GOT BUILT, IT MIGHT BE USING 20% OF ITS CAPACITY, AND OVER THE NEXT TEN YEARS IT MIGHT GO FROM 20 TO 60%.

SO EVEN THOUGH IT'S ALREADY BUILT, WE'RE STILL ASSESSING FOR THAT INCREMENTAL USAGE THAT NEW DEVELOPMENT IS USING OF IT.

SO LOOKING AT KIND OF JUMPING INTO THE CIPS IN DETAIL.

SO THIS ONE IS YOUR ROADWAY SIP.

AND AGAIN IF YOU LOOK IN DETAIL YOU'LL SEE THAT THE ORANGE WHICH ARE WIDENING PROJECT.

SO EXISTING ROADS THAT ARE THERE THAT ARE JUST BEING WIDENED AND THEN THE RED ARE BRAND NEW PROJECTS ARE JUST CUT OFF AT THE CITY LIMITS.

YOU'LL NOTICE THAT IN BLACK THEY DO EXTEND TO CORRESPOND WITH YOUR MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

BUT IN TERMS OF ELIGIBLE PROJECTS, THEY ARE CHOPPED AT YOUR CITY LIMITS LINE.

SO THERE ARE A LOT OF PROJECTS ON THERE.

YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THEM ARE TXDOT PROJECTS AS WELL.

SO THERE IS YOU KNOW, IT IS, YOU KNOW, COMMON TO WORK HAND IN HAND WITH TXDOT TO HELP COST PARTICIPATE HATE OR, YOU KNOW, TO GET THOSE PROJECTS FUNDED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION. ON THE WATER SIDE, AND HOPEFULLY THIS LOOKS MORE FAMILIAR TO YOU SINCE YOU SAW THIS A VERSION OF THIS BACK IN OCTOBER.

BUT YOU'LL NOTICE THAT IN EXCUSE ME, IN PURPLE, YOU'VE GOT YOUR EXISTING PROJECTS.

SO AGAIN, THOSE PROJECTS THAT ARE ALREADY COMPLETED.

SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THOMPSON TOWER IS KIND OF THAT PURPLE, PINK COLOR.

AND THEN RED ARE YOUR FUTURE PROJECTS.

AND WHAT'S REALLY NOTABLE AGAIN IS WE'RE SHOWING THE WATER PLANT THERE ON THE WEST SIDE OF TOWN.

SO AGAIN, IN TERMS OF WHAT IS GOING TO DRIVE THE FEE THAT'S ASSESSED TO A HOME, THE WATER PLANT IS REALLY ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONTRIBUTORS.

ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE, SAME COLORS.

PURPLE IS EXISTING, RED ARE YOUR FUTURE GRAVITY OR CONVEYANCE LINES.

AND THEN AGAIN, YOU'VE GOT YOUR BIG TWO BIGGEST PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING TO DRIVE THE COST ARE A POTENTIAL NEW PLANT ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF TOWN, AND THEN A ANTICIPATED UPGRADE OF YOUR LEGACY PLANT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN.

SO ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? OKAY. SO THAT WAS IT.

THAT'S THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS.

THAT'S THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN.

AND AS I MENTIONED, WE'LL BE BACK IN FRONT OF YOU IN DECEMBER TO TALK ABOUT THE REAL RATES BUT TALKING ABOUT ACTIONS AND NEXT STEPS.

SO ONE OF THE REQUIRED STEPS WAS GOING TO YOUR NEWLY FORMED CIAC COMMITTEE.

SO WE DID THAT TWO WEEKS AGO OR LAST WEEK TWO WEEKS AGO.

AND THEY CAN SUMMARIZE IN THE MINUTES THEY MADE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS

[00:25:07]

PLANS. AND THEY HAD THE OPTION TO SUBMIT ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO THIS BODY.

AND I DON'T BELIEVE THEY DID.

OKAY, SO THE ASK OF THIS BODY IS TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE ROADWAY, WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, WHICH I BELIEVE IS THE NEXT AGENDA ITEM.

FOLLOWING THIS, IF YOU SO CHOOSE.

WHERE WE ARE IN THE OVERALL PROCESS, JUST TO SEE HOW MANY MORE TIMES YOU'LL GET TO SEE ME OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS.

AS I MENTIONED, WE DID CIAC A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO.

WE'RE HERE DOING OUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IN DECEMBER.

ON DECEMBER 9TH, WE'LL BE BACK TO DISCUSS THE FULL STUDY AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION AND APPROVAL OF THE STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE RATES. AND THEN IN JANUARY, WE ANTICIPATE HAVING THE SECOND IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE READING.

AND THEN ADDITIONALLY A PRESENTATION TO DO ON THE RATES.

SO JUST A BRIEF COMMENT ON THAT.

SO YOU'VE GOT, YOU KNOW, PROJECTS THAT NEED TO BE BUILT TO FUND INFRASTRUCTURE, LAND, THE IMPACT FEES CAN COVER A PORTION OF IT.

AND THEN WHAT'S REMAINING IS FREQUENTLY PICKED UP BY YOUR WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE.

SO THE RESULTS OF WHATEVER YOU ALL CHOOSE IN TERMS OF ADOPTION OF A OF AN AMOUNT IN DECEMBER THAT WILL GET REFLECTED IN THAT RATE STUDY THAT COMES IN JANUARY.

SO ANY QUESTIONS I KNOW THAT'S NOT TERRIBLY INTERESTING.

SO, I TRIED TO KEEP IT A SHORT.

VERY INTERESTING. ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME.

ALL RIGHT ANDREW THANK YOU SO MUCH.

WE APPRECIATE YOU ALL. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, ANDREW.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM THREE WE'RE GOING TO OPEN UP TO A PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:26.

[3. PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN RELATING TO POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF IMPACT FEES FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS AND THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS. RESOLUTION R2024-11-26]

AND THIS ITEM IS TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LAND AND ASSUMPTIONS OF A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

THIS IS RESOLUTION 2024-1126.

ANY COMMENTS FROM STAFF? NO, SIR. NO FURTHER COMMENTS.

I THINK ANDREW SUMMARIZED EVERYTHING VERY WELL.

SO, RESOLUTION AVAILABLE FOR ACTION TONIGHT.

ALL RIGHT.

MR. MAYOR, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION R 2024-1126.

I'M GOING TO SECOND THAT. ALL RIGHT.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. ALL RIGHT.

THAT PASSES.

AND WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:27.

NON PUBLIC ITEMS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ITEM FOUR. CONSIDER A SECOND READING ORDINANCE TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON THE AMENDMENT OF APPENDIX B ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.

[4. CONSIDER SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON AN AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX “B,” “ZONING” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS TO GRANT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING IN A SF-2, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, ON APPROXIMATELY 0.22 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 406 N. CHURCH STREET. (SPECIFIC USE PERMIT APPLICATION 2024-08—MR. BRENDAN MITCHELL) (THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL, 5-0, COMMISSIONER LANIER ABSENT.) ORDINANCE 2024-11-32]

CITY OF DECATUR.

THIS IS APPLICATION 2024-08.

YOU HAD YOUR FIRST READING A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, AND THERE'S NOT BEEN ANY CHANGES? ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2024 1132.

SECOND. SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN.

ALL RIGHT. THAT PASSES.

ITEM FIVE CONSIDERS SECOND READING AND ORDINANCE.

[5. CONSIDER SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON AN AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX “B,” “ZONING” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS TO GRANT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DAY CARE IN A SF-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, ON APPROXIMATELY 7.56 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 2601 S. FM 51. (SPECIFIC USE PERMIT APPLICATION 2024-09—MS. ALEXANDRIA GILLISPIE, ON BEHALF OF DECATUR CHURCH OF CHRIST) (THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND 4-0, COMMISSIONER HICKS RECUSED AND COMMISSIONER LANIER ABSENT.) ORDINANCE 2024-11-33]

TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON AMENDMENT.

APPENDIX B TO ZONING OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.

CITY DECATUR.

THIS IS ORDINANCE 2024-1133.

AGAIN, YOU HAD YOUR FIRST READING A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO.

THERE'S NOT BEEN ANY CHANGES SINCE THAT PRESENTATION.

ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 2024 1133.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

SO WE HAVE A DID YOU GET THAT, SUSIE? MOTION AND SECOND.

OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT MOTION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

ALL RIGHT, THAT PASSES.

ITEM SIX. CONSIDER TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DECATUR AND KEY CONSTRUCTION TEXAS, LLC.

[6. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK (CMAR) AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS AND KEY CONSTRUCTION TEXAS, LLC FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION 2 AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS. ]

MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I'LL LET CHIEF BENNETT INTRODUCE THE [INAUDIBLE] AND KEY CHIEF.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

I'M SUPER GLAD TO BE HERE TONIGHT TO BRING THIS BEFORE YOU, BECAUSE I HOPE IT'S THE LAST STEP BEFORE WE CAN ACTUALLY GO TO WORK AND PUTTING THIS TOGETHER.

YOU'LL REMEMBER LAST MEETING WE ASKED YOU TO TAKE NO ACTION.

WE HAD SOME REALLY GREAT COMPANIES.

UNFORTUNATELY, BY THAT TIME IN THAT MEETING, WE COULDN'T COME TO AN AGREEMENT WITH A PREVIOUS COMPANY.

SO WE TOOK THE NUMBER TWO, WHICH INADVERTENTLY WAS THE SAME SCORE OUT AS THE FIRST ONE.

[00:30:04]

SO WE WERE VERY PLEASED WITH THAT.

AND KEY CONSTRUCTION HAS ONCE SHOWED US THAT WE MOVED FORWARD IN A PERFECT WAY.

WITH US TONIGHT IS STEPHEN WELLS WITH KEY CONSTRUCTION, AND HE HAS A FEW WORDS TO SAY TO YOU.

AND OBVIOUSLY OUR OWNER AGENTS FDCS, IS ALWAYS BY OUR SIDE THROUGH THIS WHOLE PROCESS.

STEPHEN. YEAH.

WE WE'RE REALLY APPRECIATIVE OF THE OPPORTUNITY.

HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, I GUESS.

VERY LUCKY, AS FATE WOULD HAVE IT, THAT SOMEBODY MADE SOME BAD DECISIONS AND PUT ME IN THE ROOM.

SO EXCITED TO GET THIS ONE GOING AND HELP CHIEF BUILD OUT THE NEW STATION.

SO, ANY QUESTIONS FROM COUNCIL? NO. ALL RIGHT.

WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU.

AND APPRECIATE ALL THE ALL THE WORK DONE BY OUR FIRE CHIEF.

ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS? I WOULD ONLY MAKE ONE HOUR LEGAL.

PAM HAS BEEN A HUGE HELP OVER THE LAST FOUR WEEKS AND I COMMEND HER.

ALL RIGHT. NICE RECOGNITION.

WELL, COUNCIL, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM YOU? WE'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION.

I MOVE THAT WE CHOOSE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK.

CMAR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS AND KEY CONSTRUCTION, TEXAS.

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION NUMBER TWO.

AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

ALL RIGHT. THAT PASSES.

ITEM SEVEN.

[7. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO APPROVE AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DECATUR, TEXAS AND ANTONIO HUERTA AND MARIA MENDEZ FOR ONE-STORY FRAME RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED AT 502 N. ARTHUR AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS.]

CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO APPROVE AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DECATUR AND ANTONIO PUERTA AND MARIA MÉNDEZ.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL ENGINEER EARL SMITH IS STANDING BY ONLINE TO WALK YOU THROUGH ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

EARL. HI, EVERYBODY.

THE. THIS ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT IS A RESULT OF A PLANNING PROCESS THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE GOING THROUGH IN ORDER TO SEEK A FUTURE BUILDING PERMIT.

THIS IS A STANDARD TEMPLATE FORM THAT WE USE ALL THE TIME.

PAM, THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS APPROVED THIS.

IT IS FOR A ONE STORY, FRAME RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY ON EAST BROWN STREET.

WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY DOCUMENTS.

AND I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

VERY GOOD. COUNCIL, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM EARL? ALL RIGHT, WELL, WE'LL LOOK.

LOOK FOR A MOTION.

MR. MAYOR, I'D MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DECATUR AND ANTONIO ORETA AND MARIA MÉNDEZ FOR A ONE STORY, FRAME RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, LOCATED AT 502 NORTH ARTHUR, AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

ALL RIGHT. THAT PASSES.

[8. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION FOR THE DECATUR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RUNWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT. RESOLUTION R2024- 11-27]

ITEM EIGHT. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION FOR THE DECATUR MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RUNWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING US TO ENTER INTO A COST SHARING RELATIONSHIP WITH TXDOT.

TOTAL COST OF THE REHAB ON THE RUNWAY IS EXPECTED TO BE JUST OVER $4 MILLION.

OUR SHARE WOULD ONLY BE 10% OF THAT IF YOU APPROVE THE RESOLUTION TONIGHT.

IT ALLOWS US TO MOVE FORWARD IN THE NEXT STEPS, WHICH WOULD BE DESIGN AND ENGINEERING AND THAT SORT OF THING.

ON THE REHAB AT THE EXISTING RUNWAY.

AND I WOULD NOTE THAT THE FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE AIRPORT FUND.

SO OUR SHARE $406,775 WE DO HAVE AVAILABLE AND IT CAN BE PUT FORWARD FOR OUR COST SHARE.

VERY GOOD. AND I'M HAPPY TO LET GREG ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS HE'S BEEN OVERSEEING THIS PROJECT FROM THE BEGINNING.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WELL, WE LOVE THESE KINDS OF PROJECTS.

WE'RE 90% PAID BY AND ALSO LOVE THAT WE HAVE THE FUNDS FOR THE OTHER 10%.

SO ALL RIGHT, WE'LL LOOK FOR A MOTION.

MR. MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE RESOLUTION 2024 1127.

I'M GOING TO SECOND THAT. ALL RIGHT.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THAT? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

VERY GOOD. THAT PASSES.

[9. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON A GOVERNMENT LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN NATIONAL LEASING COMPANY FOR A 2024 CHEVROLET SILVERADO CREW CAB 4WD FOR THE DECATUR FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.]

[00:35:03]

ITEM NINE. CONSIDER TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ON A GOVERNMENT LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN NATIONAL LEASING COMPANY FOR A 2024 CHEVY SILVERADO. MAYOR.

COUNCIL. THIS IS A FIRST AND FOREMOST A VEHICLE THAT WE WERE APPROVED IN OUR LEASE LINE FOR BUDGET.

ORIGINALLY, WE HAD PLANNED ON A TAHOE, BUT WHEN LEARNING THAT THE DELIVERY OF THE VEHICLE ITSELF WAS GOING TO BE SEPTEMBER OCTOBER OF 25 WITH A 90 TO 120 DAY BUILD OUT, WE DECIDED TO STOP AND THINK ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE, BECAUSE THE VEHICLE THAT G4 IS A 2013 FORD WAS 74,000 MILES.

SO HE IS BETTER FITTED IN A TAHOE.

SO, WHAT I HAD TO DO IS STOP AND THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE DON'T WANT THIS FORD IN THE POSITION IT CAME FROM, AND OPERATIONS REASONS DOES NOT NEED TO BE A BRAND NEW VEHICLE, SO MADE THE DECISION TO START FUNNELING PICKUPS THROUGH ADMIN SO THAT THEY GO DOWN TO THE OPERATIONAL POINTS IN THAT DIRECTION.

AND YES, I ALWAYS SAY I DON'T WANT TO BE THE GUY THAT TAKES THE NEW STUFF, BUT CHIEF SMITH REQUESTS THE TAHOE.

SO THIS THIS WILL BE A VEHICLE THAT I'LL START DRIVING.

ALL RIGHT. CHIEF. I DO LOOK AT IT.

AND IT'S OVER $52,000.

AND I KNOW WE'VE BOUGHT A LOT OF THINGS LATELY.

ANYTHING OVER 50 GRAND, WE USUALLY LOOK AT DOING BIDS, AND I KNOW WITH THE LEASE, IT'S A DIFFERENT CONCEPT.