[ITEM 2: Consider and take appropriate action regarding approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting Minutes from July 9, 2024.]

TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING P&Z COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY THE 9TH, 2024.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? HEARING NONE. WELL, I DO ACTUALLY HAVE A COMMENT.

I HAD A QUESTION. I NOTICED THIS THIS COMMENT IN HERE IT SAYS FOR QUESTIONS, COMMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN STAFF AND PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, SEE THE VIDEO DATED. IS THAT JUST SAVING YOU TIME OR DON'T YOU NORMALLY JUST GO AHEAD AND TRANSCRIBE? THERE WERE A LOT OF COMMENTS BACK AND FORTH.

SO TO KEEP IT ACCURATE, IS THAT OKAY PAM, THAT WE DID THAT.

THAT WAS MY QUESTION.

WHERE DOES IT SAY THAT? IT SAYS IT RIGHT IN THE MEETING MINUTES OF [INAUDIBLE] UNDER ITEM ITEM ONE, PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. IT WAS THE THE CONGLOMERATE.

I DIDN'T SEE THAT.

SO LET ME LAY EYES ON THAT.

AND IF IT'S NOT JUST WE'LL TABLE THE ITEM AND THEN I'LL GO IN AND TYPE THEM ALL UP.

RIGHT. SO ALL THAT'S REQUIRED FOR MINUTES IS OUR ACTIONS.

SO SOMETIMES YOU'LL WANT TO GIVE A CONTEXT, BUT IT'S NOT EVEN NECESSARY.

SO NO WE WON'T DO IT LIKE THIS.

WELL WE WOULD, BUT THE ACTIONS ARE WHAT'S NECESSARY IN THE MINUTES.

SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO GIVE THE WHOLE DISCUSSION UNLESS IT'S GOING TO BE IMPORTANT FOR SOME REASON.

SOMETIMES YOU CAN JUST SAY AFTER CONVERSATION, AFTER DISCUSSION AFTER DISCUSSION, MOTION MADE.

YES. YES.

THAT'S TRUE. SOMETIMES, THOUGH, IT IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO MAKE A RECORD OF REASONS, AND IN THOSE INSTANCES YOU WOULD WANT TO GO AHEAD AND LIST THEM OUT IN THE MINUTES.

BUT OTHERWISE ALL THAT'S REQUIRED IN THE MINUTES ARE THE ACTIONS THAT WERE TAKEN.

I GUESS THERE WERE THERE WAS JUST A LOT OF DISCUSSION ON CARPORTS AND MOBILE FOOD UNITS, AND I DIDN'T KNOW IF WE WE AS A GROUP WANTED TO TRY TO CAPTURE THAT IN THE MEETING MINUTES. RIGHT. YOU COULD DECIDE THAT IF YOU WANT TO CAPTURE IT FOR HISTORICAL RECORD, CERTAINLY YOU COULD.

BUT WE WOULD NEED TO COME BACK THROUGH AND DEVELOP THAT IN THE ACTUAL WRITTEN MINUTES.

OKAY. AND ALL OF THOSE VIDEOS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE FROM THE CITY'S WEBSITE FOR ANYBODY THAT'S CURIOUS ABOUT WHAT TOOK PLACE DURING THAT MEETING. ARE THEY ALL ARCHIVED AND SAVED LARGELY IN PERPETUITY, OR AT LEAST FOR A LONG TIME? SOMETHING THAT MIGHT NOT EXIST.

WELL, THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING IF THEY WERE ARCHIVED IN PERPETUITY, THEN MAYBE.

BUT I DON'T KNOW WILL, IT'S KIND OF UP TO YOU, IF YOU WOULD LIKE THEM TO TYPE THEM UP.

I SEE YOUR POINT.

YEAH. I WAS JUST A LOT OF DISCUSSION.

YEAH. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THAT MEMORIALIZED IN A WAY? I DON'T THINK ON THIS PARTICULAR TOPIC I WOULDN'T, BUT MORE OF JUST A QUESTION.

IT WAS MORE OF A JUST A QUESTION THAT IF I SEE THAT GOING FORWARD, I MAY.

WELL, WHAT I REMEMBER ABOUT THIS MEETING WAS THAT IT WAS RECOMMENDED, LIKE PARTS WERE RECOMMENDED, SO THAT THE THE MOTIONS WOULD BE DOCUMENTED. BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THAT BIG NIGHT ABOUT THE CARPORT DISCUSSION AND THAT WHOLE MULTIFACETED I'M ASSUMING ZONING ORDINANCE, CORRECT. OUT OF CURIOSITY, HAS THE COUNCIL ALREADY ACTED ON THESE? YES. IT WILL BE A SECOND READING AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.

[00:05:01]

DID THEY ACCEPT OUR RECOMMENDATIONS? WELL, THEY WE DON'T KNOW YET BECAUSE IT'S BEEN A FIRST READING, BUT THEY HAVE SEEN IT AND IT LOOKS ALL LOOKS FAVORABLE.

IT'S ALL LOOKING VERY REGULAR IN PROCESS, BUT THEY WILL APPROVE AT THE NEXT MEETING OR NOT.

BUT WHAT I REMEMBER IS YOU ALL DID THIS SECTION MOTION SECOND ONE OF THOSE PASSED 3 TO 2, I BELIEVE.

YES. AND THEN THE OTHER PORTIONS WHERE YOU SET OUT YOUR VOTE, YOU BROKE OUT YOUR VOTE WERE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL.

YES. MAYBE WE SHOULD REWRITE IT ON THIS PARTICULAR ONE.

ESPECIALLY IF THE VOTE IS 3 TO 2.

THE VOTES THAT WERE TAKEN ON IT.

ESPECIALLY IF IT'S 3 TO 2.

YEAH, RIGHT.

THOSE VOTES NEED TO BE IN THERE.

WHAT WAS MOVED? WHO WAS THE PERSON-- DO THESE MEETING MINUTES GET I MEAN, I KNOW THEY'RE TRANSCRIBED.

DOES THE COPY GET SENT TO CITY COUNCIL SO THEY CAN REVIEW THE DISCUSSION? THEY DON'T NECESSARILY.

THAT'S NOT PART OF THE REGULAR OKAY.

IT'S AVAILABLE TO THEM.

IF THEY WANT TO SEE IT, IT'S AVAILABLE TO THEM.

IF THEY WANT TO SEE IT.

STAFF USUALLY PUTS AT ON THE AGENDA WHAT THE VOTE WAS OR LIKE A QUICK REFERENCE.

OKAY, SO I'M I GUESS I'M MAKING IF YOU'RE READY, I CAN MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS FOR NEXT MEETING AND I'LL SECOND THAT.

OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER KLOSE TO TABLE THIS.

I THINK IT'S JULY 9TH MEETING TILL THE NOTES.

AND THEN I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF TO SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE AYE AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? ITEM THREE, CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY

[ITEM 3: Consider and take appropriate action regarding approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Special Meeting Minutes from July 30, 2024. ]

30TH. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? HEARING NONE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT OR DENY.

MOTION TO ACCEPT.

I'VE GOT A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CROSS TO ACCEPT.

I NEED A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. I'VE GOT A SECOND FROM A COMMISSIONER FROM COMMISSIONER HICKS.

THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. GOING INTO PUBLIC HEARING ITEM FOUR.

[ITEM 4: RP2024-03 Hear comments and take action to make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request to final plat Lots 1R-2R, Block 203, James Tarleton Addition, being a replat of Block 203, James Tarleton Addition to the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. Property is located at 905 North Trinity Street. (Replat Application 2024-03— Eleazar Ovalle-Sanchez)]

BUT THE COMMISSION WILL MOVE INTO A PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME.

THE COMMISSION IS NOT ALLOWED TO ASK QUESTIONS, RESPOND TO QUESTIONS OR COMMENT DURING PUBLIC HEARING.

THE COMMISSIONERS WILL RESERVE ALL QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND THEN THE DISCUSSION ITEM IS OPENED.

SO THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS NOW OPENED AT 5:38, WAYNE.

THIS IS REQUEST TO FINAL PLAT LOTS 1R-2R BLOCK 203 JAMES TARLETON ADDITION.

IT'S APPROXIMATE 0.402 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A REPLAT OF PART OF BLOCK 203 JAMES TARLETON ADDITION. PROPERTY IS BEING REPLATTED TO BUILD TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, AND THE PROPERTY IS MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 905 NORTH TRINITY.

THERE'S A COPY, A COPY OF THE PLAT IN YOUR PACKET, IT'S ALSO ON THE SCREEN.

THERE WERE 25 PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WERE NOTIFIED, AND WE RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSES FROM THAT.

THIS IS A PROPERTY RIGHT DOWN HERE ON NORTH TRINITY AT A HOUSE ON IT.

IT WAS PRETTY BAD SHAPE.

THEY'VE SINCE COMPLETELY DEMOLISHED EVERYTHING ON THE PROPERTY.

IT'S CLEARED, AND THEY'RE WANTING TO REPLAT THIS SO THAT THEY'RE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH SPLITTING THE LOTS AND BUILDING TWO NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AT THAT LOCATION.

THE PLAT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR'S ZONING ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF RP 2024-03.

THANK YOU WAYNE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE? OKAY. IF THERE'S NO ONE WISHING TO SPEAK, THEN I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.

IT IS NOW 5:39.

COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH. DID I GET THAT NOTICE? I'M SORRY. WAS ONE OF THOSE NOTICES SENT TO ME? LET ME GO BACK TO YOUR PROPERTY.

I JUST DON'T REMEMBER SEEING IT.

[00:10:03]

I THOUGHT IT WOULD I JUST DON'T REMEMBER SEEING THE NOTICE.

MY ONLY CONCERN IS THAT IS A HISTORICAL PART OF TOWN THAT HISTORICALLY HAS HAD LARGE LOTS WITH GOOD SIZED HOMES ON IT, AND THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A CHANGE OF CHARACTER TO CUT IT IN HALF.

SO IF I'M LOOKING AT THE PLAT NOW, IT'S GOING TO HAVE ONE LOT WITH AN ADDRESS ON TRINITY AND THE OTHER LOT WITH AN ADDRESS ON STATE.

CORRECT. AND THEN.

AND THEY'RE BOTH STILL GOING TO BE WIDE.

THEY JUST WON'T BE DEEP.

DO WE KNOW IF THEY INTEND ON MAKING THAT GRAVEL ROAD INTO A PASS THROUGH? THEY DO NOT. THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO THEM.

THAT ACTUALLY BELONGS TO THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR.

IS THAT MR. HAVILAND'S PROPERTY.

SO AS FAR AS ZONING I MEAN, YOU'VE SAID IT MEETS ZONING, RIGHT? IT'S THE LOT SIZES ARE IN EXCESS OF WHAT THE CURRENT ZONING IS.

IS THAT SF-1? IT'S SF-2, ISN'T IT? ISN'T THAT SF-2 CHERYL? YES. REALLY? I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT WHOLE STREET WAS SF-1, BUT I HAVEN'T.

THE ONES WITH THE LARGER LOTS.

YES. I THOUGHT IT WAS SF-1 BECAUSE THE LOTS ARE LARGE THROUGH THERE.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? OKAY. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL TO HOLD ON JUST A SECOND.

IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S A LOT IMMEDIATELY SOUTH THAT'S THE SAME SIZE THAT THESE ARE BEING BROKEN INTO.

YEAH. THERE'S SMALL LITTLE FRAME HOUSE THERE THAT I THINK HAD BEEN USED FOR A RENTAL FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

ESTATE TYPE HOMES.

MIC] NOT SURE WHY WE SHOW THAT WE DID MAIL ONE TO THAT ADDRESS.

DID NOT MAIL ONE TO MY ADDRESS.

WE DID ONE DID SEND ONE TO 204.

YES. OKAY. WELL THEN MAYBE I GOT IT AND IT WOUND UP IN THE TRASH.

I DON'T KNOW, I KNOW ABOUT IT NOW AND I KNEW THAT IT WAS COMING.

SO IT'S NOT LIKE THIS IS NEWS TO ME.

I MEAN, IF YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT IT, WE CAN DEFINITELY.

NO, I'M NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.

WE REALLY COULDN'T HEAR THE DISCUSSION.

THERE'S NO ISSUES WITH ZONING, THOUGH.

THERE IS NO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

OKAY. SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION OR A DENIAL TO CITY COUNCIL ON ITEM FOUR, WHICH IS RP 2024-03 I NEED A MOTION TO ACCEPT OR DENY.

I'M SORRY FOR RECOMMENDATION.

YEAH, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS ITEM.

OKAY. I'VE GOT A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER KLOSE, I'VE GOT A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LANIER.

YES, SIR. OKAY.

AND ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. OKAY.

WE'RE GOING TO ITEM FIVE.

[ITEM 5: RP2024-04 Hear comments and take action to make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request to final plat Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Eagle Drive Baptist Church Addition, being a replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Eagle Drive Baptist Church Addition to the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. Properties are located at 1301 Eagle Drive and 2001 Deer Park Road. (Replat Application 2024-04—Nate Mara, on behalf of property owners Eagle Drive Baptist Church and Nathan and Amber Mara)]

WE'RE GOING TO GO BACK INTO PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.

IT IS NOW 5:44 WAYNE, GO.

THIS IS REPLAT 2024-04.

THIS IS LOTS 1R-2R BLOCK ONE EAGLE DRIVE BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION.

[00:15:07]

THIS IS NATHAN MARA'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE EAGLE DRIVE BAPTIST CHURCH AND NATHAN AND AMBER MARA TO FINAL PLAT LOTS R, 1R AND 2R BLOCK ONE EAGLE DRIVE BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION.

IN ADDITION, AN ESTIMATED 5.26 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS ONE AND TWO BLOCK ONE OF THE EAGLE DRIVE BAPTIST CHURCH ADDITION.

PROPERTIES ARE BEING PROPERLY PLATTED, AND THE PROPERTIES ARE MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1301 EAGLE DRIVE AND 2001 DEER PARK ROAD.

THERE IS A EXHIBIT FOR THE PLAT ON THE SCREEN.

23 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED.

WE RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSE FOR THAT.

THE PLAT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR'S ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF REPLAT 2024-04.

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE? OKAY. HEARING NONE, THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT IS NOW 5:46.

COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? WHAT DID WE DO A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO ON THAT LOT? WE'VE HAD SOME OTHER PLANNING SOMETHING CAME BEFORE US ON THAT.

SOMETHING ABOUT THE CHURCH OR? MIC] SO THE INTENT THERE IS TO INCREASE MY BACKYARD AND DECREASE THEIR MOWING AREA AT THE CHURCH.

OKAY. AND I'M REPRESENTING THEM BECAUSE I'VE AGREED TO PAY ALL THE FEES AND GO THROUGH ALL THE PROCESSES.

HOW LONG AGO WAS THAT? SO THAT WAS IN WE PURCHASED IT IN 2016 IS WHEN THAT WAS DONE.

IF THERE WAS ANYTHING ELSE THAT CAME UP, I'M NOT AWARE BEFORE THIS BODY.

IT'D BEEN A COUPLE OF YEARS.

I DIDN'T THINK IT'D BEEN QUITE THAT LONG.

OKAY, I THINK I DO REMEMBER SINCE YOU MENTIONED IT.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE, COMMISSIONER.

THAT'S A GREAT MEMORY.

I DO REMEMBER THERE WAS SOMETHING ABOUT THAT LOT.

AND THAT'S WHAT IT WAS, THOUGH.

WASN'T THERE WASN'T THERE A NOISE ISSUE RELATED? THERE WAS. THERE WAS ACTUALLY A LIGHTING ISSUE, A LIGHTING ISSUE.

RIGHT. THAT CAME FROM A DIFFERENT THE SAME PROPERTY, BUT IT AFFECTED A DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS.

WE ACTUALLY ENJOY THE LIGHTS ON OUR SIDE BECAUSE IT HELPS SECURE THE BACKYARD.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THAT IS THAT LIGHTING ISSUE BEEN RESOLVED TO EVERYONE'S SATISFACTION? IT WAS RESOLVED. WONDERFUL.

OKAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND, TO APPROVE OR RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OR DENIAL.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE [INAUDIBLE] NOW GO AHEAD.

I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL.

I'LL SECOND. OKAY.

I'VE GOT A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER LANIER.

I'VE GOT A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HICKS.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. WE'RE GOING NOW INTO NON PUBLIC HEARING.

[ITEM 6: FP2024-02 Consider and make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request to final plat an approximate 46.488-acre tract of land creating 188 lots for Meadow Creek Development, Phase 1 located west of FM 730 in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. (Application FP2024-02—Mr. Jody Boyd, on behalf of Derek McCarley and Rickey McCarley) ]

ITEM NUMBER SIX WAYNE.

FINAL PLAT 2024-02.

THIS IS THE MEADOW CREEK ADDITION FINAL PLAT PHASE ONE.

[00:20:01]

THIS IS JODY BOYD'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF DEREK MCCARLEY AND TODD MCCARLEY TO FINAL PLAT MEADOW CREEK ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS.

IT'S APPROXIMATELY 46.488 ACRES OF LAND, CREATING 188 LOTS FOR MEADOW CREEK DEVELOPMENT PHASE ONE LOCATED WEST OF 730, IN THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS.

THE PROPERTY IS MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE MEADOW CREEK SUBDIVISION.

THE PLAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE.

PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED CONDITIONALLY, THAT NO FINAL PLAT CAN BE APPROVED AND NO CONSTRUCTION IS ALLOWED UNTIL THE ACCEPTANCE LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE SERVICE PROVIDER ENLINK IS RECEIVED, AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 504.1 OF THE CITY'S SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS.

THAT INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED.

WE DO HAVE THIS DOWN AS OF 8/6/2024, 30 DAY EXTENSION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.

THEY HAVE NOT PROVIDED COMMENTS TO ADDRESS THESE COMMENTS FROM APRIL 30TH, 2024.

AND AS OF 5:00 TODAY, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 212 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, STAFF HAS POSTED AN ITEM FOR THE COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OR DENIAL OF FINAL PLAT 2024-02 TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH TEXAS OPEN MEETINGS ACT. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 202 4-02 BASED ON THE SPECIFIC DEFICIENCIES CITED IN ATTACHMENT ONE AND TWO.

IF THE 30 DAY EXTENSION IS GRANTED, APPLICANT WILL BE RECONSIDERED AT A REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 3RD, 2024, SO THIS WILL PUT IT BACK ON THE REGULAR WON'T HAVE TO HAVE ANOTHER MEETING, A SPECIAL MEETING FOR THIS TO BE CONSIDERED BETWEEN NOW AND SEPTEMBER.

THERE WILL BE OR THERE WILL NOT BE? THERE WILL NOT BE A SPECIAL MEETING.

YOUR REGULAR MEETING IS ON SEPTEMBER 3RD.

OKAY. COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS? IT LOOKS LIKE STAFF IS STUTTERING A LITTLE BIT.

THEY'RE DOUBLE RECOMMENDED.

I KNOW I SAW THAT.

YEAH. RECOMMENDS.

RECOMMENDS. IS THERE.

SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S BEEN NO MOVEMENT ON THIS WHATSOEVER SINCE APRIL.

IS THAT? THEY ARE STILL IN THE PROCESS OF WORKING THROUGH THIS.

THERE HAS BEEN SOME MOVEMENT ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF.

WE WE GET ASSURANCES FROM THEM ON A REGULAR BASIS THAT THEY'RE, THAT THEY SHOULD BE MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS PRETTY SOON.

WE HOPE THAT THAT'S THE CASE, BUT AS OF RIGHT NOW, STILL DO NOT HAVE THAT SERVICE PROVIDER AGREEMENT IN HAND. AND SO STILL LOOKING TO TO EXTEND THIS OUT JUST A LITTLE BIT LONGER.

IS THERE A LIMIT TO THE NUMBER OF EXTENSIONS WE CAN GRANT ON THIS? THERE IS NOT HOWEVER, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WILL EXPIRE SOMETIME IN FEBRUARY.

OKAY. SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.

WE WE'RE WORKING ON ON SOME SITUATIONS.

WE KNOW THAT THEY'RE MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS AND TRYING TO PROVIDE THEM A PATH TO TO GET THAT TO ACCEPTANCE WITH THEM.

WE'LL HAVE MORE INFORMATION FOR YOU ON SEPTEMBER 3RD WHENEVER WE MEET AT THE NEXT P&Z MEETING.

OKAY.

EVERYTHING THAT'S IN HERE, IT ALWAYS TALKS ABOUT JODY BOYD'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF DEREK MCCARLEY AND TODD MCCARLEY.

THEY HAVE IN THE LAST, WELL, IN THE LAST 30 DAYS, THEY'VE PURCHASED THE PROPERTY, WE'VE RECEIVED THE INFORMATION FOR THAT.

SO THEY DO FULLY OWN THE PROPERTY NOW.

JOE. TROY, IT'S, YES, IT'S THEIR CORPORATION THAT OWNS THIS NOW.

SO THEY THEY ARE MAKING PROGRESS ON THIS.

AND THERE WAS SOME INFORMATION THAT WAS BEFORE THAT WAS BEFORE COUNCIL AT THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING FOR THE PID THAT THEY'RE PUTTING IN ON THIS.

SO THERE IS MOVEMENT ON THIS.

IT IS NOT JUST STAGNANT OUT THERE.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? I HAVE A QUESTION NOT ABOUT THIS IN PARTICULAR BUT ABOUT MEADOW CREEK AND YOU MIGHT CAN ANSWER.

THE MAIN ENTRANCE, HOW FAR IS IT FROM WHERE SOUTH MARTIN BRANCH IS?

[00:25:05]

I COULDN'T TELL YOU THE EXACT DISTANCE OFF OF THAT, BUT IT IS, IT'S PROBABLY LESS THAN A MILE.

IT'S JUST THERE'S SO MANY CARS COMING DOWN THAT ROAD NOW.

THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY THAT WAS DONE ON THIS ADDRESSES THAT.

THERE ARE DECELERATION LANE LANES TURNING LANES THAT ARE COMING OFF OF THIS THAT WILL HAVE TO BE TAKEN CARE OF THROUGH WHAT TXDOT RECOMMENDS FOR THIS.

AND THERE IS THEN THERE WILL BE A CONNECTING STREET THROUGH TO SOUTH MARTIN BRANCH? NOT IN THIS PHASE, BUT BECAUSE SOUTH MARTIN BRANCH PHASE FOUR IS IN BETWEEN THESE TWO.

BUT AT SOME POINT THE THE GENERAL PLAN DID CONTEMPLATE A CONNECTION.

YES. [INAUDIBLE] I REMEMBER SEEING THAT BACK WHEN WE FIRST LOOKED AT THE WHOLE THING.

YES, THAT THAT WAS PART OF WHAT WAS PROPOSED ON THIS WAS THAT IT WOULD EVENTUALLY TIE TOGETHER THE TWO SUBDIVISIONS THERE.

YEAH.

MIC]. IN THE UPPER RIGHT HAND.

YEAH, YEAH.

COMMISSIONERS, IF I MAY, WHILE THEY'RE LOOKING UP THE CORRECT MAP, I WILL TELL YOU THAT COUNCIL IS DEALING WITH THE PID SIDE OF THIS AGREEMENT AS WE SPEAK.

WE HAVE A CALENDAR OF EVENTS THAT WILL KICK OFF ON THE 12TH, ESTABLISHING THEIR PID DISTRICT, AND EVERYTHING THAT GOES WITH THAT WILL FOLLOW SUBSEQUENTLY IN COUNCIL MEETINGS. SO TO STAFF'S POINT, THEY DO OWN THE PROPERTY AND THEY ARE MOVING FORWARD.

SO IT'S JUST THESE THINGS ARE KIND OF SLOW AT CERTAIN TIMES.

SO I THINK THAT JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE SEASON THAT THEY'RE IN.

THE PID DISTRICT.

OKAY. THEY MAY HAVE MORE.

YES, SIR. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.

THEY MAY HAVE MORE LEVERAGE FOR NEGOTIATIONS NOW THAT THEY'RE OWNERS.

OKAY. AS FAR AS THE OIL COMPANY GOES OR SOMETHING.

YEAH, I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT, BUT I CERTAINLY KNOW THERE ARE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PIECES WILL GET EASIER ONCE THEY HAVE THEIR PID ESTABLISHED.

DO YOU KNOW ABOUT THE ADDITION TO SOUTH MARTIN BRANCH? IS IT GOING TO BE A PID OR IS IT CITY? I DON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION INDICATING THAT IT WOULD BE.

I ACTUALLY DON'T KNOW THAT I'VE SEEN THOSE PLANS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS, SO.

SO THIS THIS STREET RIGHT HERE.

YEAH. YEAH, YEAH.

YEAH. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? OKAY. HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION ON APPLICATION 2024-02. I'LL OFFER A MOTION TO, ARE WE APPROVING OR RECOMMENDING APPROVAL? THIS WOULD BE AN APPROVAL.

TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION ON THIS ITEM.

OKAY. I'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF.

I NEED A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. I GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER KLOSE.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE AYE AYE AYE.

MOTION CARRIES.

MOVING ON TO ITEM SEVEN, WAYNE.

[ITEM 7: Discussion of future agenda new business items, staff requests and potential special called meeting and/or workshop requests: a. As of agenda posting, the September 3, 2024, meeting currently has no (0) new Planning applications. Submittal deadline was August 5, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. (The meeting will be an in- person meeting with potential virtual attendance of staff and members of the public unless otherwise determined.)]

AS OF THIS AGENDA POSTING, THE SEPTEMBER 3RD, 2024 MEETING CURRENTLY HAS TWO PLANNING APPLICATIONS.

SUBMITTAL DEADLINE WAS AUGUST 5TH AT 5 P.M..

RIGHT NOW WE HAVE MEADOW CREEK PHASE ONE FINAL PLAT, WHICH WILL, DEPENDING ON WHAT ACTIONS HAPPEN BETWEEN NOW AND THEN AND THEN WE HAVE A REPLAT OF THE MARKETPLACE ADDITION, WHICH IS LOWE'S AND WENDY'S.

AND THEY'RE PLATTING THOSE TWO LOTS SEPARATELY.

THEY ARE CURRENTLY ONE LOT, AND THEY'RE SPLITTING THOSE OUT INTO TWO SEPARATE LOTS.

THEY'RE WORKING ON THE PARKING LOT.

[00:30:01]

THEY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THE PARKING LOT.

READY FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN? OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? AND I'M SORRY. I WAS GOING TO ASK FOR A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

YES, I AM. I NEED A MOTION TO ADJOURN.

MOVE TO ADJOURN. I NEED A SECOND.

SO MOVED. OKAY, LET'S GET OUT OF HERE.