[00:00:06]
THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO GO RIGHT ON INTO OUR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. AND WHILE WE'RE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS, THE COMMISSION WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS OR RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
[ITEM 1: ZC2023-08 Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request to rezone approximately 0.162 acres of land located at 401 East Mulberry Street from a Single-Family Residential Zoning District (SF-2) to a Two-Family Residential Zoning District (2F).]
THE COMMISSIONERS WILL RESERVE ALL THE QUESTIONS UNTIL THE UNTIL AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND THE DISCUSSION ITEM IS OPENED.SO GOING TO PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ONE, WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THAT UP AT 5:35.
IT'S APPROXIMATELY 0.162 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT SOUTH CATES STREET AND EAST MULBERRY STREET, AND THE PROPERTY IS COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 401 EAST MULBERRY.
AND THEN WE HAVE THE TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
UM, THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS SF-2 ON THE NORTH END, ON THE SOUTH AND ON THE EAST.
IT'S TWO FAMILY, 2-F, AND ON THE WEST.
AND BEFORE ANYTHING, WE HAVE TO HAVE A PLAT AND BUILDING PERMITS.
AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
THAT'S LAND USE. AND THEN ON THE NEXT MAP YOU'LL SEE THE ZONING.
ARE DUPLEXES ALL AROUND IT, AND IT WAS THE ONLY LOT LEFT TO BE REZONED.
AND WE CONTACTED 19 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED AND WE HAD NO OPPOSITION IN FAVOR OF OR NEUTRAL.
AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING CHANGE.
2023-08. ANY QUESTIONS? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? THIS IS ON ITEM NUMBER ONE.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE? WE HAVE ONE PERSON ONLINE.
NOT THAT THEY WANT TO SPEAK. NO.
OKAY. OKAY, THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONERS. QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? CONCERNS? CONDOLENCES? OKAY. HEARING NONE.
I WOULD MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ITEM NUMBER ONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE ZONING CHANGE TO, UH, TO F.
OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION BY COMMISSIONER KLOSE.
I'VE GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HICKS.
OKAY. GOING INTO PUBLIC HEARING.
CHERYL, MR. RYAN OWENS REQUEST ON BEHALF OF STARFLOWER HOMES TO FINAL PLAT, LOT 1R BLOCK 4 PARKVIEW ADDITION.
IT'S APPROXIMATELY 0.162 ACRES TRACT OF LAND IN THE CITY OF DECATUR.
[ITEM 2: RP2023-06 Hear comments and take action to make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request to final plat Lot 1R, Block 4, Parkview Addition, being approximately a 0.162 acre tract of land located north of East Mulberry Street and east of North Cates in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas for property located at 401 East Mulberry Street.]
IT'S BEING A REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, PARKVIEW ADDITION.PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED, AND WE RECEIVED NO COMMENTS BACK.
STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF REPLAT 2023-06.
OKAY. THANK YOU. CHERYL, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? OKAY. HEARING NONE, THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING.
[00:05:05]
PARDON. WHY IS THIS ITEM NOT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? BECAUSE IT SEEMS. BECAUSE IT'S NOT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.BECAUSE WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA DO NOT REQUIRE PUBLIC.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL OR DENIAL.
RECOMMEND. I RECOMMEND I MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF.
OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER CROSS ON RECOMMENDING AN APPROVAL.
I'LL SECOND. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF A SECOND.
ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. THOSE OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES.
OKAY. GOING INTO THE NONPUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ITEM THREE., CHERYL.
[ITEM 3: CONSENT AGENDA]
CONSIDERED IN A NORMAL SEQUENCE ON THE AGENDA.STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
AND WE DO HAVE SIX ITEMS. DO YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH THOSE? I DON'T THINK WE'VE EVER. WE DON'T NEED TO KNOW.
OKAY, SO HEARING THAT, THEN I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON ITEM A, WHICH IS PP.
NO, IT'S THE WHOLE THING FOR ALL OF THEM.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND OR TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
THANK YOU. OKAY, I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER KLOSSE RECOMMENDING AN APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL.
I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER LANIER ON A SECOND.
THOSE OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES ITEM FOUR.
ITEM FOUR. IT'S ZENO ROSTOM'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF DECATUR DEER RUN INVESTORS TO PRELIMINARY PLAT NOVEL TERRACE LOFT ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS.
IT'S AN APPROXIMATE 8.496 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE DAVID MOSES SURVEY.
[ITEM 4: PP2023-10 Consider and make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request from Zheeno Rostam to preliminary plat an 8.496-acre tract of land in the David Moses Survey, Abstract Number 537, in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. (Part 1 of 2)]
ABSTRACT NUMBER 537 CITY DECATUR WISE COUNTY.THE PROPERTY IS MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 700 SOUTH DEER PARK.
THE PLAT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS AS OF 1/2/2024. A 30-DAY EXTENSION HAD NOT BEEN RESUBMITTED.
HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF THE AGENDA PREPARATION FOR POSTING, THEY HAD NOT SUBMITTED DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES. AND THEY STILL HAVE NOT RESUBMITTED THEIR PROJECT.
SO, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER TWO, 12 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, STAFF HAS ALSO POSTED AN ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A DENIAL FOR THE COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND.
THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? WHERE WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK? THIS IS THE PROPERTY OWNER, AMIR.
OH, PLEASE. COME ON UP, SIR, TO THE MICROPHONE.
GIVE ME YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE.
WHAT'S YOUR LAST NAME? ZAIN. OKAY.
AND I'M ONE OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
AND WHAT IS YOUR ADDRESS? MY RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS.
YES, SIR. IS 12780 BRUSCHETTA DRIVE, FRISCO.
GO AHEAD. UH, WELL, I DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING TECHNICAL.
YEAH, JUST. I WANTED TO, AS MUCH.
I KNOW MY ARCHITECT, MR. ZANE, HAS KIND OF [INAUDIBLE] MAYBE NOT FORMAL, UH, FOR EXTENSION OF.
I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT I WAS TOLD, THAT HE HAS APPLIED FOR THE EXTENSION.
OKAY, FOR ONE MONTH IN SUBMITTING THE RE-- BUT MA'AM IS SAYING THAT SHE MIGHT HAVE NOT GOT IT OR APPROVED IT, BUT ANYWAY THIS IS YOURS.
I WOULD JUST REQUEST TO, LIKE, ENTERTAIN IT, BECAUSE WE WANT TO SAVE THE TIME.
AND IF ANYTHING, WE CAN DO, WE ARE, I MEAN, WE WILL DO THAT.
[00:10:05]
FORMALITIES, WHATEVER.THANK YOU. MAYOR. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
WANT TO REQUEST A 30-DAY EXTENSION? WE HADN'T RECEIVED ANY COPIES.
OKAY. AND YOU CAN REQUEST THAT.
NOW, I THINK THAT, UH, WE CAN'T VOTE ON THAT.
ALL WE CAN VOTE ON IS ON THE WAY THAT IT'S WROTE UP.
WE NEED TO RECEIVE THE 30-DAY REQUEST IN WRITING, AND THEN YOU CAN VOTE ON THE 30-DAY REQUEST, EVEN IF IT'S NOT ON THE AGENDA FOR TONIGHT, CORRECT? YES, HE CAN MAKE A 30-DAY REQUEST BECAUSE THE PROPERTY IS ON THE AGENDA.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL.
IF HE MAKES THE 30-DAY EXTENSION, YOU COULD GRANT 30-DAY EXTENSION.
BUT HE HAS TO DO IT IN WRITING.
OR DO WE HAVE TO WAIT TILL HE WRITES IT OUT? YOU DO. OKAY. AND MISS FOOSE IS GOING TO GET THE FORM FOR HIM.
MY ARCHITECT WILL BE, I MEAN, SUBMITTING IT ELECTRONICALLY.
I WILL JUST CALL HIM AND HE WILL DO IT WITHIN.
WITHIN? WE JUST MAKE IT CONTINGENT UPON HIM.
SO, WHAT DO WE DO TONIGHT? I THINK YOU COULD PASS THIS ITEM FOR THE MOMENT, AND I THINK THE NEXT ITEM HAS A 30-DAY EXTENSION REQUEST. SO, YOU COULD GO TO THE NEXT ITEM, BUT WE, YOU COULD RECESS TO FOR US TO GET IT IN WRITING.
OKAY. MR. WOODRUFF, LOOK LIKE YOU WANTED TO SAY SOMETHING.
WE EITHER HAVE TO APPROVE IT OVER THE OBJECTIONS OF STAFF, ARE DENIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS, OR WAIT UNTIL AMIR CAN ACTUALLY GIVE US SOMETHING IN WRITING THAT SAYS, PLEASE GIVE US A 30-DAY EXTENSION AND THEN WE CAN ACT ON THAT.
AND DOES THAT HAVE TO BE ON A? HE'S PRINTING IT RIGHT NOW.
WELL, THEN, UH, WE GO INTO RECESS.
OH, WE CAN COME BACK TO ADAM FOR LATER.
YES, YOU CAN. OKAY, THEN WE'RE GOING TO SKIP ITEM FOUR.
FOR NOW. WE'RE GOING INTO ITEM FIVE.
THANK YOU. AMIR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
NO, I WAS JUST SAID THE SAME THING.
THEN WE CAN GO TO NUMBER FIVE.
[ITEM 5: PP2023-11 Commission to take action to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to preliminary plat Lots 1X, 2X, 5X, 6X, 1-114, Block 1, Lots 1-17, Block 2, Lots 4X, 1-81, Block 3, Lots 3X, 1-13, Block 4, Lots 1-25, Block 5, Lots 1-11, Block 6, Lots 1-6, Block 7, Meadow Creek Addition, to the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas, being an approximate 137.02-acre tract of land, of which 83.22 acres is in the William S. Hogue Survey, Abstract Number 385, Wise County, Texas, and of which 53.80 acres is in the Smith Bowen Survey, Abstract Number 51, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas.]
YES. NUMBER FIVE.JODY BOYD'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF RICK AND DEREK MCCAULEY.
MEADOW CREEK ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DECATUR, APPROXIMATELY 137.02 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OF WHICH 83.22 ACRES IS IN THE WILLIAM S HOAG SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 385, AND OF WHICH 53.88 ACRES IS IN THE SMITH BOWEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 51. THE PLAT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, AND THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
WE DID RECEIVE A 30-DAY EXTENSION, WHICH YOU DO HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU.
AND. WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE 30-DAY EXTENSION.
OKAY. AND IF GRANTED, WE WILL BE HAVING.
OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS? MAKE SURE THEY HAVE A JANUARY 30TH OPEN OKAY I LOOKED THROUGH THE MATERIALS THERE AND I WAS TRYING TO DESIGNATE OR FIGURE OUT EXACTLY HOW MANY LOTS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS. THERE WAS 345 LOTS, I BELIEVE.
DO YOU KNOW, NATE, HOW MANY LOTS WERE ON MEADOW CREEK? ABOUT 345.
CAME UP WITH 460, BUT I WASN'T SURE.
WORK THEY STILL NEED TO DO TO GET.
YEAH, I THINK THAT'S WHY THEY'RE ASKING FOR THAT 30-DAY EXTENSION.
COMMISSIONER CROSS, THE NOVEMBER PLANS THAT WE HAVE 481 LOTS OR 81.
OKAY, SO WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. THEN ON, THE VOTE FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION.
[00:15:04]
YES. ITEM FIVE.DOES EVERYBODY CHECK THEIR CALENDARS JUST TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE OKAY? CITY ATTORNEY LISTON IT HAS A PROBLEM WITH THE 30TH.
SO. AND WHAT? 30TH? YES, THE 30TH.
FEBRUARY 1ST. IF WE COULD DO FEBRUARY 1ST, IT'S A THURSDAY.
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH JANUARY 30TH BUT LET ME CHECK FEBRUARY 1ST.
NO, HE HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE 30TH.
YEAH, I'M GOOD FOR FEBRUARY 1ST.
WHAT'S ANOTHER ONE? WE HAVE TRAINING SCHEDULED FOR PNC.
WE'LL GET BACK TO THAT IN ONE MINUTE.
I HAVE TO LOOK AT MY DESK, SO I'LL EMAIL YOU TOMORROW.
OKAY. SO, WE NEED TO, I'LL ENTERTAIN A VOTE ON ITEM FIVE FOR RECOMMENDATION OF THE OR FOR APPROVAL OF THE 30-DAY EXTENSION FOR 2023-11.
I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION.
OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER KLOSE TO APPROVE, UH, OR TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.
I NEED A SECOND. NO, YOU'RE JUST APPROVING IT.
SECOND. OKAY, YOU DON'T HAVE TO SEND THE 30-DAY REQUEST TO THE COUNCIL.
THIS BODY IS APPROVING THE 30-DAY EXTENSION, AND THAT WAS HIS MOTION.
OKAY. AND THEN I'VE GOT A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF.
THOSE OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES BACK TO ITEM FOUR.
OR ARE WE GOING TO OUT OF SIX? GOING BACK TO ITEM FOUR.
[ITEM 4: PP2023-10 Consider and make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request from Zheeno Rostam to preliminary plat an 8.496-acre tract of land in the David Moses Survey, Abstract Number 537, in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. (Part 2 of 2)]
WE NOW HAVE A 30-DAY EXTENSION THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR ITEM FOUR, WHICH IS 2023-10.
I WOULD OFFER A MOTION THAT WE GRANT THE 30-DAY EXTENSION FOR ITEM FOUR.
AND THAT'S COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF MADE A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE 30-DAY EXTENSION.
GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CROSS.
THAT WAS THE TOWNHOME SUBDIVISION, RIGHT? YES, IT WAS. HOW MANY? HOW MANY LOTS ARE ON THAT ONE.
YES, WE WILL HAVE TO HAVE A SPECIAL MEETING.
[ITEM 6: Discussion of future agenda new business items, staff requests and potential special called meeting and/or workshop requests:]
AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE 30 DAYS WILL BE FEBRUARY 1ST.WE CHECKED ALL THE ITEMS. AND CURRENTLY I HAVE DON'T KNOW OF ANYTHING COMING.
I MIGHT HAVE ONE FINAL PLAT, REPLAT ON THAT WE MIGHT HAVE ON THAT AGENDA ALSO.
SO, WE MIGHT NOT HAVE A MEETING IN FEBRUARY.
IT'LL OTHER THAN THE SPECIAL MEETING ON SPECIAL MEETING ON THE FIRST.
SO, IT WILL BE IN LIEU OF THE SIXTH MEETING.
OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS? ANYTHING GOOD FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING? HEARING NONE. THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL THIS MEETING CLOSED.
I DON'T KNOW THAT I HAVE TO GET TO MY DESK AND SEE WHAT WE HAVE.
IS IT NEXT WEEK? SORRY, I DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION.
I HAVE SOMEBODY ONLINE WHO WANTS TO SAY SOMETHING THOUGH, ON, LET ME UNMUTE THEM.
I'M ONE OF THE OWNERS FOR THE ITEM NUMBER FOUR THAT WE JUST DISCUSSED THE TOWNHOME PROJECT.
AND MY ARCHITECT ZENO IS ALSO ON THE LINE.
I THINK WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED YOU A 30-DAY EXTENSION SO THAT YOU'RE OKAY.
OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH. WE WERE REQUESTING TO GET AN APPROVAL THIS TIME.
UH, NO. HE'S WANTING AN APPROVAL, NOT A 30 DAY.
AND MY SUSPICION IS IF YOU WANT TO FORCE THAT ISSUE, YOU WILL NOT GET AN ANSWER THAT YOU LIKE.
[00:20:02]
SO, IF I WERE YOU, I'D TAKE THE 30-DAY EXTENSION.OKAY. OKAY, SO I'LL TAKE THE THREE DIRECTIONS.
DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? EILEEN HAD ANSWERED ONE.
NOT YET. SHE'S GOT TO GO CHECK ON HER.
I HAVE TO CHECK. BUT IF IT'S NEXT WEEK, WE NEED TO KNOW.
CHECK IN THE MORNING FIRST THING.
IS IT SOMETHING I COULD LOOK UP? CHERYL? IS IT SOMETHING I COULD LOOK UP I HAVE TO CHECK WITH? OKAY. I'LL GET BACK WITH YOU IN THE MORNING.
I MUST HAVE GOTTEN AN EMAIL FROM THEM.
I DON'T KNOW. I HAVEN'T DON'T HAVE ONE IN THE 13TH.
I THINK I WAS GOING TO GO TO THAT AS WELL.
THE LAST I REMEMBER IS THAT THEY WOULD JUST GET BACK TO US WHEN IT WAS IN.
MY EMAIL TOMORROW AND I'LL GET BACK WITH ALL OF YOU TOMORROW, I DON'T YEAH, OKAY.
GIVEN HOW MY EMAIL ISN'T REALLY WORKING WITH YOU, YOU MIGHT SEND ME A TEXT OR SOMETHING.
OKAY. BECAUSE YOUR EMAIL DOESN'T LIKE ME.
YOU CAN CANCEL. YOU CAN CLOSE THE MEETING.
GO AHEAD. ANYBODY ELSE? OKAY. MEETING WILL BE CLOSED.
IT IS NOW 5:55.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.