[ITEM 3: CP2023-05 Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on the request of City of Decatur to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for an approximate 7.795 acres of land located at 201 N. Chico St., 203 N. Chico St., 205 N. Chico St., 208 N. Chico St., 209 N. Chico St., and 217 N. Chico St. and including approximately 0.502 acres to the centerline of N. Chico St., 0.799 acres to the centerline of N. Highway 81-287 Business, 0.245 acres of W. Auction St., and 0.244 acres to the centerline of W. Walnut Rd. where adjacent to the subject tracts from Community Commercial Land Use (CC) to Activity Center Land Use (AC).]

FOR CHICO STREET TO CHANGE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO ACTIVITY CENTER.

HERE, THE CITY OF DECATUR'S REQUEST TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL. LAND USE DESIGNATION TO ACTIVITY CENTER, APPROXIMATELY 7.795 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED WEST OF US 287 AND NORTH OF WALNUT STREET IN DECATUR, TEXAS.

PROPERTIES ARE MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 201 THROUGH 217 NORTH CHICO STREET.

THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS LAND USE DESIGNATION OF COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.

HOWEVER, CITY OF DECATUR IS REQUESTING THAT SUCH DESIGNATION BE AMENDED TO ACTIVITY CENTER.

LAND USE DESIGNATION, BASED ON THE PROPERTY'S LOCATION AND THE PROPOSED FUTURE USE AS MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

SURROUNDING LAND USES ON ALL SIDES ARE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL EXCEPT FOR ON THE EAST, WHICH ALSO HAS SOME DOWNTOWN.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THE LAND USE CHANGE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION TO ACTIVITY CENTER.

LAND USE DESIGNATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE C-2 THOROUGHFARE BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT.

UH. I'M SORRY.

NOW? WELL, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU DID IT OR I DID.

ACTIVITY CENTER OFFERS THE ABILITY TO LIVE, WORK AND PLAY IN ONE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA.

COMPACT AREA WITH A HIGH INTENSITY OF USES ORGANIZED AROUND NODES OF ACTIVITY.

UH PRIMARY LAND USES IN THAT AREA ARE RETAIL, COMMERCIAL, CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENTS, OFFICES, HOTELS, ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS.

SECONDARY LAND USES ARE CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES.

UH ACTIVITY CENTER LAND USE DESIGNATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE C-2 THOROUGHFARE BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT, AND BEFORE ANY DEVELOPMENT MAY OCCUR, APPLICANTS WILL HAVE TO SUBMIT PLATING AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS.

UH, SO I THINK EVERYBODY'S FAMILIAR WITH THIS AREA AND THIS, THIS PART OF TOWN WHERE WE'RE AT RIGHT THERE, WE'RE CHANGING.

WE'RE WE'RE REQUESTING THIS LAND USE BE CHANGED TO ACTIVITY CENTER.

IT SEEMS MORE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS GOING ON IN THAT AREA AS FAR AS THE LAND USE, AND ALLOWS FOR WIDER RANGE OF USES TO GO IN THERE IN THAT C TWO DISTRICT, IT'S ALREADY ZONED C TWO.

WE'RE NOT CHANGING THE ZONING AT ALL.

UM, THIS IS THE ZONING MAP, WHICH INDICATES THAT IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED C TWO AND WILL REMAINED ZONED C TWO.

TWENTY SIX PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED, RECEIVED NO RESPONSES IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION TO OR NEUTRAL TO.

AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 202305.

THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM?

[00:05:07]

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ONLINE? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON THE LINE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? OKAY, HEARING NONE, I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IT IS NOW 5:36.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS? OKAY. HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR RECOMMENDATION.

I DID HAVE A QUESTION.

OKAY. GO AHEAD. DOES CHICO STREET, IS IT INTENDED TO KEEP THAT OPEN OR WILL THAT BE ABANDONED? THE DEVELOPMENT AS IT'S CURRENTLY PLANNED WOULD KEEP CHICO STREET OPEN.

OKAY. THE STREET'S GOING TO NEED SOME WORK. YES.

SOMETHING. OKAY.

OKAY. WAS.

AND THEN IT WENT OFF AND IT JUST CAME BACK.

IS IT WORKING? CAN YOU HEAR? LIGHTS ON. YES, MA'AM.

WE'RE GOOD. OKAY. DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO, FOR RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL.

THE RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

OKAY, I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER BERUBE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

I NEED A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. OKAY.

I'VE GOT A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CROSS.

ALL IN FAVOR AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY, GOING BACK INTO PUBLIC HEARING, IT IS NOW 5:37, WAYNE.

ALL RIGHT. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS A ZONING AMENDMENT.

[ITEM 4: SI2023-03 Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on the request from City of Decatur regarding proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding height restrictions and square footage restrictions for Multiple Family (MF) structures located in C-2, Thoroughfare Business Districts (C-2).]

STAFF HAS CONDUCTED A REVIEW OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND HAVE DETERMINED THAT THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS ARE IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE OBJECTIVE OF THE DECATUR 2050 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THE ZONING ORDINANCE ALLOWS MULTIFAMILY DWELLING UNITS IN SEVERAL DISTRICTS.

GENERALLY, MULTIFAMILY UNITS ARE LIMITED TO 12,000FT².

IT HAS COME TO THE ATTENTION OF CITY STAFF THAT WHEN MULTIFAMILY UNITS ARE LOCATED IN THE C-2 THOROUGHFARE BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO EXCEED 12,000FT² IN THE C-2 THOROUGHFARE BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT.

IN RECENT MONTHS, CITY STAFF HAS BEEN APPROACHED WITH A PROJECT FOR A MULTIFAMILY SENIOR LIVING FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN THE C-2 ZONING DISTRICT.

CURRENTLY, THE MULTIFAMILY BUILDING WOULD BE LIMITED TO 12,000FT².

WITH THIS CHANGE, THE BUILDING COULD BE GREATER THAN 12,000FT² AS THEY HAVE SUBMITTED IT.

CITY COUNCIL AMENDED THE CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE IN 2019 TO INCREASE THE MULTIFAMILY UNITS TO 12,000FT².

THIS CHANGE WOULD ALLOW MULTIFAMILY UNITS ONLY WHEN THEY ARE LOCATED IN THE C-2 ZONING DISTRICT, TO EXCEED 12,000FT².

ALL OTHER SAFETY AND BUILDING STANDARDS WILL STILL APPLY.

THIS CHANGE IS IN LINE WITH THE FOLLOWING DIRECTION GIVEN TO STAFF BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN 20TH OCTOBER OF 2018.

STAFF WAS GIVEN DIRECTION THAT THE LIMITATION SHOULD BE INCREASED TO PROVIDE A MORE SUITABLE MAXIMUM SIZE LIMITATION OR REMOVED.

SO THIS WOULD ONLY APPLY TO THE C TWO ZONING DISTRICT WHEN IT'S IN THAT C TWO.

ANYTHING THAT'S ZONED MULTIFAMILY WOULD STILL HAVE THE LIMITATION OF 12,000FT².

SO THAT MULTIFAMILY GENERALLY ACTS AS A BUFFER BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

AND SO THAT SIZE LIMITATION WOULD STILL BE IN PLACE FOR THAT MULTIFAMILY ZONING DISTRICT IN AC2 ZONING DISTRICT.

IT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO GO TO THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE BY BUILDING CODE.

WHICH IS IT VARIES DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION.

I KNEW SOMEBODY WOULD ASK THAT QUESTION.

I HAVE NOTES. UM, SO CURRENTLY THE NUMBER OF STORIES IS LIMITED TO THREE.

IS THAT RIGHT? YES.

SO IT'S LIMITED. IS IT 2 OR 3? NO, TWO.

IT'S LIMITED TO TWO FOR ALL MULTIFAMILY STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF DECATUR.

[00:10:01]

THIS WOULD ALLOW THAT TO CHANGE OVER AND GO TO BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS.

SO DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION.

FIVE B CONSTRUCTION IS BASICALLY STICK FRAME CONSTRUCTION TWO BY FOURS.

WITH THAT IT WOULD INCREASE THAT HEIGHT TO 4 OR 3 SQUARE THREE STORIES UNDER 5B.

5A WHICH IS A PROTECTED TYPE CONSTRUCTION.

IT'S A FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD TYPE SITUATION.

IT WOULD ALLOW THEM TO GO TO FOUR STORIES.

IF YOU GO TO A METAL TYPE CONSTRUCTION NONCOMBUSTIBLE TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN A TWO B, IT COULD GO UP TO FIVE STORIES.

IF YOU GO TO A TYPE ONE, CONSTRUCTION WHICH IS MORE RESTRICTIVE.

REQUIRES SOME FIRE PROTECTION.

FOR THE STRUCTURAL STEEL THAT'S IN THERE.

AT THAT POINT, YOU COULD GO UNLIMITED INTO THE NUMBER OF STORIES THAT YOU COULD HAVE, BUT IT WOULD GENERALLY BE 12 STORIES ON THAT.

THANK YOU. NOW, AS FAR AS THE FLOOR AREA, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, CURRENTLY IT'S 12,000FT².

WITH THE STICK FRAME CONSTRUCTION, IT WOULD GO UP TO 21,000FT².

TWO B CONSTRUCTION, THE METAL CONSTRUCTION BE 48,000FT².

AND THEN AGAIN ON THE THE FLOOR AREA FOR A ONE TYPE ONE CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE UNLIMITED WITH THAT.

BUT YOU'RE STILL LIMITED BY YOUR BUILDING SETBACKS AND ALL OF THE OTHER DEVICES THAT ARE IN PLACE TO KEEP THOSE AND LOCK COVERAGE ALSO.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT.

THANK YOU WAYNE. DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY, HEARING NONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.

IT IS NOW 5:43.

COMMISSIONERS, NOW, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? COMMENT. IT DEPENDS ON WHERE IN THE CITY IT IS, BUT WE NEED TO BE COGNIZANT OF THE FACT THAT WITH REGARD TO THE AIRPORT, THERE ARE ALSO HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS FOR STRUCTURES.

IN THAT PART OF TOWN.

YES, SIR. YES, SIR.

AND THOSE ARE, THOSE ARE UNDERLINED ON THE ZONING FOR THAT.

AND SO YES, IT WOULD BE MAINTAINED.

YES. SO YOU WOULD STILL HAVE FLOOR AREA RATIOS DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF YOUR LOT.

THOSE ARE ALL LIMITING FACTORS ON HOW BIG THESE BUILDINGS ARE GOING TO BECOME.

WHEN WE SAY UNLIMITED, YES, IT'S UNLIMITED AS ALLOWED BY THE BUILDING CODE.

BUT THE THERE ARE STILL OTHER MECHANISMS IN PLACE THROUGH OUR ZONING ORDINANCE THAT ARE GOING TO LIMIT THEM IN SIZE BASED ON THE SIZE OF THE LOT.

YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A SMALL FOOTPRINT LOT THAT HAS A GIGANTIC BUILDING ON IT.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS.

I'LL RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER BERUBE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

I'LL SECOND. GOT COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF TO RECOMMEND OR FOR A SECOND.

THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY, GOING TO ITEM SIX, I'M SORRY, ITEM FIVE.

[TEM 5: SUP2023-07 Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request from Shayne Hardin, on behalf of Piper Blu Salon, to allow permanent makeup application, as a secondary use, in a C-1, Restricted Business Zoning District, on approximately 0.0165 acres of land located at 600 W. Walnut St. Ste. A.]

WE'RE GOING BACK INTO PUBLIC HEARING.

IT IS NOW 5:44, WAYNE.

THIS IS SUP 202 307.

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE, 600 WEST WALNUT STREET, SUITE A.

IT'S A REQUEST FOR A PERMANENT MAKEUP APPLICATION IN THE C-1 DISTRICT.

SHANE HARDIN'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF PIPER BLUE SALON TO GRANT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW PERMANENT MAKEUP APPLICATION AS A SECONDARY USE IN A C-1 RESTRICTED BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT.

APPROXIMATELY 0.0165 ACRES OF LAND BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE OF THE HARVEY EDITION, AND THE PROPERTY IS MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 600 WEST WALNUT STREET SUITE A.

THE DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS ADOPTED IN MARCH OF 2015 AS FAR AS USE REGULATIONS.

THE PERMITTED USE ALLOWED PROVIDES THAT PERMANENT MAKEUP APPLICATIONS CAN BE AS SECONDARY USE, AND ARE PERMITTED WITH A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS, INCLUDING THE C-1 RESTRICTED BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT.

THE PROPOSED APPLICATION OF PERMANENT MAKEUP IS A SECONDARY USE, AND THE SITE PLAN R IS IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CRITERIA FOR GRANTING AN

[00:15:08]

SUP. THIS EXISTING LAND USE, WHICH IS DOWNTOWN EXISTING ZONING, WHICH IS C1.

AND A FLOOR PLAN FOR THAT SUITE.

JUST RIGHT DOWN THE STREET HERE ON WALNUT.

16 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED.

WE RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSES.

FOR THE AREA THAT WAS NOTIFIED.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE IS NOT A RECOMMENDING ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS BE IMPOSED FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SUP, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SUP.

2020 308.

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY. HEARING NONE, WE'RE GONNA GO AHEAD AND CLOSE.

THE PUBLIC HEARING IT IS 547 COMMISSIONERS.

ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS? IS THAT THE LITTLE STRIP CENTER ON THE CORNER? ISN'T THAT CORRECT? IT IS 3 OR 4 BUSINESSES IN THERE? YES, SIR. OKAY.

ANYONE ELSE BEEN IN THERE FOR A LONG, LONG TIME? OKAY, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL TO CITY COUNCIL.

MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER LANIER TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SUP 2023-08.

I NEED A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. OKAY, I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER BERUBE TO SECOND THAT RECOMMENDATION.

THOSE IN FAVOR AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.

GOING BACK INTO PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ON ITEM SIX.

[ITEM 6: SUP2023-08 Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request from Chana Massey, to allow an Accessory Dwelling in a SF-2, Single-Family Residential Zoning District, on approximately 0.232 acres of land located at 300 S. Hill Street.]

IT IS NOW 5:48.

WAYNE. AGENDA ITEM SIX, SUP IS 202308, 300 SOUTH HILL STREET FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING STRUCTURE.

[INAUDIBLE] MASSIE'S REQUEST TO GRANT A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING IN AN SF2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. APPROXIMATELY 2.0.275 ACRES OF LAND BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PART OF LOT ONE, BLOCK THREE CD EDITION, AND THE PROPERTY IS MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 300 SOUTH HILL.

DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE WAS AMENDED IN MARCH OF 2015.

THE USE REGULATIONS AND PROVIDES THAT ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED WITH AN APPROVED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS, INCLUDING THE TWO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

THE STRUCTURE FOR THE PROPOSED DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING HAS BEEN IN EXISTENCE SINCE 2002, PER WISE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

THE SITE PLAN IS IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CRITERIA FOR GRANTING AN SUP.

EXISTING LAND USE MAP, WHICH IS DOWNTOWN, AND EXISTING ZONING MAP, WHICH IS SF2.

PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN.

AND IT IS THE SMALLER STRUCTURE THAT'S OFF TO THE SIDE.

THE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF YOUR PICTURE, I BELIEVE.

YEAH.

19 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED RECEIVED ZERO OPPOSED.

THAT NUMBER ACTUALLY CHANGED AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS.

WE HAVE TWO IN FAVOR OF AND ZERO NEUTRAL.

STAFF IS NOT RECOMMENDING THAT ANY ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS BE IMPOSED FOR APPROVAL OF THE SUP, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE SUP 202308. THANK YOU WAYNE, DO WE HAVE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? ANYONE ONLINE.

OKAY. HEARING NONE, WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE.

PUBLIC HEARING IT IS NOW 5:50.

COMMISSIONERS, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? I HAVE A COMMENT.

OKAY. I'M ASSUMING YOU ARE THE MASSES.

AND I JUST WANT TO SAY IT LOOKS BEAUTIFUL OVER THERE.

IT'S SO EXCITING FOR ME TO SEE THESE OLDER PROPERTIES GET FIXED.

THEY'VE DONE A GREAT JOB WITH THIS.

LOOKS REALLY NICE.

IT LOOKS AWESOME OVER THERE.

IS THIS ACCESSORY IN THE DOWNSTAIRS PORTION OR THE UPSTAIRS? IT LOOKED LIKE TWO LEVELS.

UPSTAIRS. UPSTAIRS.

OKAY. OKAY.

[00:20:02]

I DIDN'T NOTICE STAIRS ON THE DIAGRAM.

THAT'S WHY I WAS CURIOUS ABOUT THAT.

THERE'S A SET OF STAIRS OVER THERE.

THEY'LL HAVE TO BE SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THEM TO GET THEM UP THERE.

BUT YES, THERE ARE STAIRS.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? CONCERNS? OKAY. HEARING NONE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL TO CITY COUNCIL ON SUP 202 3-08.

AND I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE IT.

OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER CROSS TO HAS MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I NEED A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. YOU FEEL ME? COMMISSIONER HICKS SAID THAT HE'LL SECOND THAT MOTION.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES.

OKAY. WE ARE NOW MOVING INTO THE NONPUBLIC HEARING ITEMS.

[ITEM 7: CONSENT AGENDA]

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, WAYNE.

THIS IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.

ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS LISTED ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND WILL BE RECOMMENDED ONE MOTION.

THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS UNLESS THE P&Z COMMISSIONER SO REQUESTS.

IN WHICH EVENT THE ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND CONSIDERED IN ITS NORMAL SEQUENCE ON THE AGENDA.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

WE HAVE ONE ITEM ON THERE.

IT'S A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR REQUEST ON BEHALF FOR DAVID GREER, ON BEHALF OF NORTEX AG PROPERTIES, INC.

AND E.W. MORAN LLC FOR 3.584 ACRES.

IT'S IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST OF THAT OTHER AGENDA ITEM.

IS THAT CORRECT? THIS IS THE BE THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD.

YES. THIS WOULD BE BEHIND THAT PROPERTY UP TO 287.

YES. YOU GO, IT'S THAT ROW OF HOUSES THAT ARE IN THERE.

THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S BEEN TRAINING ON.

YES. OKAY.

OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? IS THERE A SLIDE ON THAT? ANOTHER SLIDE. NO.

NOT FOR THIS ONE. IT'S JUST BEING A CONSENT AGENDA.

YES. I'M CURIOUS AS TO HOW MANY UNITS THERE ARE.

IS IT IN HERE SOMEWHERE? IT IS NOT.

AT THIS POINT, WE WILL HAVE A FINAL PLAT THAT WILL BE BEFORE YOU AT YOUR NEXT MEETING, THAT WE'LL HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON IT AT THAT POINT.

THIS IS IT. YEAH.

OKAY. GOTCHA.

ALL RIGHT. OH, YOU GOT THAT? YEAH. OKAY, OKAY.

YEAH. I JUST DIDN'T PRINT IT OFF.

YEAH. FUZZY. OKAY.

I DO NOT REMEMBER THE NUMBER OF UNITS THAT WERE INVOLVED.

WITH A NUMBER OF UNITS.

IT WAS A VERY SMALL NIGHT. IT'S LIKE 39.

I WANTED TO SAY 40 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BUT THAT SOUNDS RIGHT.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? PAM, WE VOTE ON THIS ALSO. THE WAY IT WAS PRESENTED WAS ON A CONSENT AGENDA, AS IF THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN MULTIPLE ITEMS. BUT THERE'S ONLY ONE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO YES, YOU'LL RECOMMEND IF YOU WANT TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL, YOU'LL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL.

OKAY. THE CONSENT AGENDA OF ALL CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER, MASON, SINCE THERE'S ONLY ONE.

EITHER WAY IS GOING TO WORK IN THIS INSTANCE.

YES. YOU GOT IT.

YOU KNOW, MOVED.

OKAY, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR DENIAL.

MASON DID, AND I'LL SECOND.

OKAY. COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF MADE THE MOTION TO APPROVE.

COMMISSIONER LANIER SECOND.

ALL IN FAVOR AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED.

OKAY. NON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS, ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.

[Items 8 & 9]

WAYNE. SO THIS IS AGENDA ITEMS EIGHT AND NINE.

PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023-09 AND FINAL PLAT 2023-06.

1400 NORTH US HIGHWAY 81, 287 BUSINESS.

SO PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT PRESENTATION WAS WRITTEN FOR BOTH THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT, BUT YOU'LL HAVE TO TAKE SEPARATE ACTION ON ON EACH ONE OF

[00:25:09]

THEM. RYAN OWENS REQUEST ON BEHALF OF STAR FLOWER HOMES TO PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT ONE BLOCK ONE STAR STAR FLOWER HOMES EDITION TO THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS AND APPROXIMATE 0.22 ACRE TRACT AND THE GEORGE M.

VIGIL SURVEY.

CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS, MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 1400 NORTH US HIGHWAY 81, 287 BUSINESS.

PLAT CURRENTLY DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR'S ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS.

AS OF 11/28/23, A 30 DAY EXTENSION WAS SUBMITTED.

THE APPLICANT WAS PROVIDED WITH COMMENTS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO SUBMIT REVISED DOCUMENTS.

HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF THE AGENDA PRESENTATION, PREPARATION AND POSTING, THEY HAD NOT SUBMITTED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION REQUIREMENTS OF ALL CITY ORDINANCES.

THE APPLICANT HAS NOT SUBMITTED REVISION REVISED DOCUMENTS AS OF TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5TH, 2023.

AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2.12 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.

STAFF HAS ALSO POSTED AN ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD FOR THE COMMISSIONERS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS FOR DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023*09 AND FINAL PLAT 2023-06 TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF THE FINAL PLAT.

MM. COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.

OKAY, SO IF I CAN GET THIS RIGHT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON ITEM.

YOU'LL JUST GRANT THE 30 DAY EXTENSION OR DENY THE 30 DAY EXTENSION.

ON ITEM EIGHT.

YES, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

YOU YOURSELF, THIS BODY CAN EXTEND FOR 30 DAYS, SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO RECOMMEND THE EXTENSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

OKAY, SO WE CAN THE BODY ITSELF.

YOU CAN GIVE THE EXTENSION.

GOT YOU. SO I NEED AN APPROVAL OF THE 30 DAY EXTENSION.

I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

THIS IS FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT? PLAT, RIGHT 2023-09.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO, LET'S SEE, APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION.

I'LL SECOND. GOOD.

OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER BERUBE TO APPROVE FOR THE EXTENSION.

I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER CROSS AS A SECOND.

THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? OKAY. SAME GOES FOR THE 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF 2023-06.

I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE OR DENY.

I'LL OFFER A MOTION TO GRANT THE 30 DAY REQUEST ON THE FINAL PLAT.

OKAY. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND. SECOND. GOT COMMISSIONER HICKS TO SECOND.

THOSE IN FAVOR AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED.

MOTION CARRIES.

[ITEM 10: PP2023-10 Consider and make a recommendation to City Council regarding a request from Zheeno Rostam to preliminary plat an 8.496-acre tract of land in the David Moses Survery, Abstract Number 537, in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas.]

ITEM TEN.

WAYNE. UH, AGENDA ITEM TEN IS PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023-10, NOUVELLE TERRACE LOFTS, ADDITION, 700 SOUTH DEER PARK ROAD.

PRELIMINARY PLAT ZHEENO ROSTAM'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF DECATUR DEER RUN INVESTORS, LLC TO PRELIMINARY PLAT NOUVELLE TERRACE LOFTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DECATUR AND APPROXIMATE 8.496 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AND THE DAVID MOSES SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 537, CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS.

THE PLOT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS.

AS OF 11/29/23, A 30 DAY EXTENSION WAS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.

THE APPLICANT WAS PROVIDED COMMENTS BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON NOVEMBER 21ST, 2023, BUT AT THE TIME OF

[00:30:03]

THE PREPARATION FOR THE POSTING OF THIS AGENDA, THEY HAD NOT SUBMITTED DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.

UM. AS OF TODAY, DECEMBER 5TH, 2023, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2.12 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, STAFF HAS ALSO POSTED AN ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION TO THE PERIOD FOR THE COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OR DENIAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023 DASH TEN TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 2023-10.

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO EITHER APPROVE OR DENY OR APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DENIAL OF THE REQUESTING THE 30 DAY OF THE 30 DAY EXTENSION.

OH, YES.

OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023-10.

I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023-10.

OKAY, I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER HICKS TO GIVE A MOTION OF APPROVAL.

I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND.

WE'VE GOT COMMISSIONER LANIER SECOND.

THOSE IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? NAY. MOTION CARRIES.

MOVING TO ITEM 11, WAYNE.

[ITEM 11: PP2023-11 Commission to take action to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to preliminary plat Lots 1X, 2X, 5X, 6X, 1-114, Block 1, Lots 1-17, Block 2, Lots 4X, 1-81, Block 3, Lots 3X, 1-13, Block 4, Lots 1-25, Block 5, Lots 1-11, Block 6, Lots 1-6, Block 7, Meadow Creek Addition, to the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas, being an approximate 137.02-acre tract of land, of which 83.22 acres is in the William S. Hogue Survey, Abstract Number 385, Wise County, Texas, and of which 53.80 acres is in the Smith Bowen Survey, Abstract Number 51, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas.]

AGENDA ITEM 11 IS PRELIMINARY PLAT 2023-11, MEADOW CREEK EDITION.

PRELIMINARY PLAT.

JODY BOYD'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF RICK AND DEREK MCCAULEY TO PRELIMINARY PLAT.

MEADOW CREEK ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DECATUR, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS AN APPROXIMATE 137.02 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OF WHICH 83.22 ACRES IS IN THE WILLIAM S HOGUE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 385, WISE COUNTY, TEXAS, AND OF WHICH 53.8 ACRES IS IN THE SMITH BOWEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 51.

THE PLAT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DECATUR ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS HAS OF DECEMBER 5TH, 2023, A 30 DAY EXTENSION WAS SUBMITTED.

A REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION WAS SUBMITTED.

THE APPLICANT WAS PROVIDED COMMENTS BY THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON DECEMBER 1ST, 2023.

I THINK THAT'S THE WRONG DATE ON THAT DECEMBER.

WAS IT DECEMBER 1ST THAT THEY WERE PROVIDED THOSE? YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO SUBMIT REVISED DOCUMENTS.

HOWEVER, AT THE TIME OF AGENDA PREPARATION FOR POSTING, THEY HAD NOT SUBMITTED DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE REQUIREMENTS.

OF THE APPLICANT HAS NOT SUBMITTED REVISED DOCUMENTS AS OF TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5TH, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 2.12 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, STAFF HAS ALSO POSTED AN ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST OF A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD FOR THE COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND, MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A 30 DAY EXTENSION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION 202311.

IF GRANTED, THE APPLICATION WILL BE RECONSIDERED AT A REGULAR SCHEDULED MEETING ON JANUARY 2ND, 2024.

THANK YOU WAYNE. COMMISSIONERS, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? OKAY, HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PPA 2023-11.

SO MOVED. OKAY, I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER LANIER TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

I NEED A SECOND.

SECOND. COMMISSIONER BERUBE TO DO THE SECOND.

AND ALL IN FAVOR? AYE, AYE. THOSE OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES AND.

[ITEM 12: Discuss and approve 2024 Meeting Schedule.]

ADAM 13 SETTING YOU UP FOR THE NEW YEAR.

PRELIMINARY 2024 MEETING SCHEDULE HAS BEEN POSTED FOR THIS.

OF COURSE, THIS BOARD IS VERY INVOLVED WITH WITH THE PLATING PROCESS AND THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS THAT GOES THROUGH THERE.

I'D LIKE TO GET THAT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THOSE DATES, AND YOU'RE WELL AWARE OF THEM WELL AHEAD OF TIME.

IT MAKES IT VERY HARD WHENEVER THIS BOARD DOESN'T HAVE A QUORUM TO MOVE THROUGH.

DO YOU HAVE A PRINTOUT OF THAT WE COULD HAVE GET ON OUR CALENDAR, OUR PERSONAL CALENDARS.

[00:35:02]

I CAN SEND IT OUT TO YOU. OR YOU.

YEAH, THAT'D BE GREAT.

MISSING. MARCH 5TH WILL BE IN THE ANNEX.

YES. THAT'S WHAT THE DOUBLE PLUS SIGN RIGHT THERE HAS ON IT.

MEETINGS WILL BE HELD AT THE CITY ANNEX BUILDING DUE TO WISE COUNTY ELECTIONS NOVEMBER 5TH ALSO.

OKAY. COMMISSIONERS.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? HEARING NONE. I'M GOING TO CLOSE THIS MEETING.

HOLD ON. WE GOT ONE MORE.

WHERE? WE GOT ONE MORE 13.

OH, I'M SORRY, I WAS.

I THOUGHT THAT WAS 13.

WE GOT WELL, WE GOT TO VOTE ON THIS SCHEDULE FIRST.

WE VOTE ON THE SCHEDULE.

YES. OKAY, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SCHEDULE AS WRITTEN.

I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER HICKS TO APPROVE.

I NEED A SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. I'VE GOT COMMISSIONER WOODRUFF SECONDED.

THOSE IN FAVOR AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED, MOTION CARRIES.

NOW ITEM 13.

[ITEM 13: Discussion of future agenda new business items, staff requests and potential special called meeting and/or workshop requests: A. As of agenda posting, the January 2, 2024, meeting currently has no (0) new Planning applications. Submittal deadline was December 4, 2023, at 5:00 p.m.]

ALL RIGHT. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. AS OF THE AGENDA POSTING, THE JANUARY 2ND, 2024 MEETING HAS CURRENTLY EIGHT NEW PLANNING APPLICATIONS.

SUBMITTAL DEADLINE WAS DECEMBER 4TH.

THE MEETING WILL BE AN IN-PERSON MEETING.

UH, AND THEN IT LISTS THE ONES, OF COURSE, THE STAR FLOWER HOMES, THE NOUVELLE TERRACE, LOFT EDITION, METAL CREAKS WERE ALL ON THIS ONE HAD 30 DAY EXTENSIONS THAT WERE GRANTED TO THEM WALTER ESTATES.

IT'S A 17 ACRES OUT ON PRESCOTT.

THESE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATTING.

THE DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT EDITION, FINAL PLAT AND PARKVIEW EDITION.

WHAT IS THAT ONE? THAT'S. OH THAT'S RIGHT.

A ZONING CHANGE ON THAT ALSO.

SO THERE IS NINE ITEMS AS OF THIS AFTERNOON.

THERE MAY BE MORE.

NO. NO ACTION NEEDED ON THIS ONE.