IT'S 5:34. [Call to Order] [00:00:07] GO AHEAD AND CALL THIS MEETING FOR TUESDAY, APRIL THE FIFTH TO ORDER. [ITEM 1: Consider and take appropriate action regarding approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes from March 2, 2022.] CALL TO ORDER ITEM NUMBER ONE. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION REGARDING APPROVAL OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES FROM MARCH 2ND, 2022. COUNCILORS, ANYTHING? COMMISSIONERS, ANYTHING? QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS? HEARING NONE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN. I'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND? I GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE, AND I'VE GOT A SECOND . THOSE IN FAVOR, AYE. AYE. THOSE THAT DISAPPROVE? VERY GOOD. WELL, THAT'S A HARD ONE. THIS IS AN IN-PERSON MEETING AND WE'RE GOING TO ITEM NUMBER TWO. [ITEM 2: RP2022-01 Commission to hear comments and take action to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to final plat Lots 2R-1 and 2R-2, Block 78, South Decatur Addition, being approximately a 0.363 acre tract of land in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas and being a replat of Lot 2, and part of the alley, Block 78, South Decatur Addition and more commonly referred to as 1303 S. Trinity St., Decatur, Texas. A complete legal description of the property is found on the plat exhibit located in the staff report. (Application RP2022-01—Mr. Keith Bryan)] OH, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, AND WHEN THE COMMISSION MOVES INTO A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM, COMMISSIONS COMMISSIONERS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ASK QUESTIONS, RESPOND TO QUESTIONS OR COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE COMMISSIONERS WILL RESERVE ALL THE QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED AND THE DISCUSSION ITEM IS OPENED. ITEM NUMBER TWO, WE'RE GOING TO OPEN UP THE MEETING, A PUBLIC HEARING MEETING. IT IS 5:35. ITEM NUMBER TWO, DEDRA. ITEM NUMBER TWO IS MR. KEITH BRYAN'S REQUEST TO FINAL PLAT LOTS 2R-1 AND 2R-2 BLOCK 78 OF THE SOUTH DECATUR ADDITION. IT'S APPROXIMATELY 0.363 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE CITY OF DECATUR. IT'S A REPLAT OF LOT TWO AND AN ALLEY IN BLOCK 78 OF SOUTH DECATUR ADDITION. THE APPLICANT IS WANTING TO DIVIDE HIS PROPERTY SO THAT HE CAN BUILD BOTH A DUPLEX AND A LARGE SINGLE FAMILY HOME. THE ADDRESS IS 1303 SOUTH TRINITY STREET. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. WE [INAUDIBLE] SEND OUT NOTIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET. THERE WERE 22. ONE OPPOSED, THREE IN FAVOR AND ONE WAS NEUTRAL. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, AND THIS IS A COPY OF THE PLANT FOR YOUR INFORMATION, AND IT'S IN YOUR PACKET. THE PLANT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. YOU'RE WELCOME. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE? DO WE HAVE ANYONE ONLINE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM? THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY IS HERE. DO YOU WISH TO SAY ANYTHING? OKAY, NO ONE WISHING TO SPEAK, THEN THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CLOSED AT 5:37. AT THIS TIME, A DISCUSSION OF THE ITEM BY THE COMMISSIONERS IS OPEN. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS ABOUT THIS OR CONCERNS? VERY GOOD. THIS IS THE ONE WITH THE ALLEYWAY, RIGHT? ALL OF THE ISSUES WITH REGARD TO THE ALLEYWAY AND TITLE HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. YES, AND CHERYL, JUST SO YOU KNOW THAT I JUST GOT A MESSAGE THAT THE RECORDING STOPPED. BECAUSE IT'S BEING RECORDED ON SWAGIT. ZOOM WAS RECORDING IT. OKAY, WE'RE STILL LEGAL? YES. OKAY, CLARIFICATION, THEY'RE PLANNING TO BUILD TWO NEW BUILDINGS ON THIS PROPERTY, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. ONE WILL BE A DUPLEX. ONE WILL BE A SINGLE FAMILY HOME. WHEN YOU SAY THE ISSUE OF THE ALLEY WAS RESOLVED, HOW WAS THAT RESOLVED. DID THE ADJOINING OWNER DEED HIS INTEREST OVER TO THE APPLICANT? YES, SHE DID. OKAY, IN THAT CASE, I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER ISSUES WITH IT. ANY OTHERS? HEARING NONE, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I WOULD MOVE TO ACCEPT THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION TO ACCEPT. I NEED A SECOND. SECOND. [00:05:02] I'VE GOT A FIRST AND A SECOND. THOSE APPROVE? AYE. AYES HAVE IT. MOTION CARRIES, AND THAT WAS EILEEN, RIGHT, CECIL? YES. YES, THE SECOND. RIGHT. OKAY, OH, THAT'S RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. DO YOU WANT ME TELL YOU WHO THE NAMES ARE? YEAH, WE NEED TO HAVE IT FOR THE RECORD. REALLY? OKAY, GOING BACK INTO A PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME. [ITEM 3: RP2022-02 Commission to hear comments and take action to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to final plat Lots 1-21, Block 1, Downwind Estates, being an approximate 4.063 acre tract of land in the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas and being a replat of Lot 1-R, Block 11-R, North Decatur Addition, Decatur, Texas. A complete legal description of the property is found on the plat exhibit located in the staff report (Application RP2022-02—Mr. David Fuller, on behalf of FX5 Real Estate Investments, LLC)] IT IS NOW 5:40. ITEM NUMBER THREE, DEDRA. ITEM NUMBER THREE, I'M WAITING FOR SWAGIT TO GET TO THE POWERPOINT PRESENTATION. HELLO, CAN WE SEE THE PRESENTATION? SHE'S WORKING ON IT. ITEM NUMBER THREE RP2022-02. YES. OKAY, THIS IS FP2022-02. OKAY, SO WHAT WE'VE GOT UP ON THE SCREEN IS 2022-01? NO, THAT'S THE WRONG NUMBER AT THE TOP OF THE SCREEN. IT SHOULD BE 2022-02. YEAH, I DON'T KNOW HOW, BUT IT IS FOR THE RIGHT [INAUDIBLE]. ALL RIGHT, THIS IS MR. FULLER'S REQUEST. WE ARE ON ITEM THREE. VERY GOOD. YES. SO THE COMMISSION TO HEAR COMMENTS AND TAKE ACTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A REQUEST TO THE FINAL PLATS LOTS 1-21 BLOCK 1 DOWNWIND ESTATES BEING AN APPROXIMATE 4.063 ACRE TRACT OF LAND IN THE CITY OF DECATUR WISE COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A REPLAT OF LOT 1-R OR BLOCK 11-R NORTH DECATUR ADDITION, DECATUR, TEXAS. A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IS FOUND ON THE PLAT EXHIBIT LOCATED IN THE STAFF REPORT. MR. DAVID FULLER ON BEHALF OF FX5 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC. DEDRA. ALL RIGHT, NOW, CHERYL, DO YOU HAVE THE POWERPOINT READY? YES, IT'S UP. ALL RIGHT, CECIL READ ALL OF THAT. SO I DON'T NEED TO GO THROUGH THAT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. I WILL LET YOU KNOW THIS THESE ARE THE COMMENTS FROM STAFF. WE RECEIVED A SUBMITTAL JUST RECENTLY, PROBABLY 5 MINUTES BEFORE THE MEETING. SO STAFF HAS NOT HAD TIME TO REVIEW THE SUBMITTAL. SO YOU GUYS HAVE THE OPTION OF EITHER EITHER RECOMMENDING DENIAL OR EXTENDING THE APPLICATION ONCE AGAIN TO THE NEXT MONTH. THERE WAS A LIST OF ISSUES AND CONCERNS, ESPECIALLY FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS SIDE. PLANNING DID HAVE SOME ISSUES AS WELL. EARL MIGHT BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THE LAST RESUBMITTAL, BUT I CAN SAY THAT WHAT WAS SUBMITTED TODAY, RIGHT BEFORE THE MEETING, HE WAS ADDRESSING, I BELIEVE, MOSTLY PLANNING'S COMMENTS. SO I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW IT YET AND THEY DID COMPLETE ANOTHER APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION. OKAY, SO THIS WASN'T ANYTHING THAT THE APPLICANT DID. WELL, IT'S THE APPLICANT SURVEYOR. SO HE REPRESENTS THE APPLICANT. DOES SOMEONE HAVE A QUESTION? STAFF ITEMS OF NONCOMPLIANCE WERE PROVIDED AND THEN SO WE WERE MOVING FORWARD AND THE APPLICANT KNEW THAT THERE WAS NONCOMPLIANCE ITEMS, SO THEY'VE REQUESTED ANOTHER EXTENSION. MEANWHILE, IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY HAVE JUST NOW RESUBMITTED SOME APPLICATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMMENTS THAT HAD CAUSED THE STAFF TO RECOMMEND DENIAL. SO AT THIS POINT, THEY'RE ASKING FOR A SECOND EXTENSION, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES. [00:10:03] OKAY, ALL RIGHT, DEBORAH, GO AHEAD. YEAH, I THINK THEY WERE THINKING THAT THEY COULD GET THE RESUBMITTAL AND WE'D REVIEW IT AND THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO GET THE EXTENSION, BUT I CAN'T SIGN OFF ON IT. I HAVEN'T LOOKED AT IT AND THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. WE'RE GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING NOW. IT IS 5:44. WE'LL OPEN UP FOR DISCUSSION. COMMISSIONERS, GO AHEAD. ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS? IS THERE ANY REASON STAFF ISN'T RECOMMENDING JUST APPROVING AN EXTENSION? NO, WE'RE OKAY WITH THE EXTENSION. OKAY, I DIDN'T HEAR THAT. OH, I SEE IT UP THERE. SO STAFF DOES RECOMMEND THE APPROVAL OF THE 30 DAY EXTENSION. EVERYBODY OKAY? OKAY, THEN I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE A 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR THE RE-APPLIED APPLICATION. WILL KLOSE'S SUBMITTED A MOTION OF APPROVAL FOR THE 30 DAY EXTENSION OF THE REPLAT APPLICATION 2022-O2 AND CURTIS CRESWELL HAS SECONDED THAT MOTION. SO ALL IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? MOTION CARRIES FOR THE 30 DAY EXTENSION. OKAY, NONPUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. [ITEM 4: PP2022-01 Commission to take action to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a request to preliminary plat Lots 1-71 and HOA Lots 1-5 Block A; Lots 1-68 and HOA Lot 6, Block B; Lots 1-14 and HOA Lot 7, Block C; Lots 1-32 and HOA Lot 8, Block D; Lots 1-23, Block E; Lots 1-25 and HOA Lot 9, Block F; Lots 1-44 and HOA Lot 10, Lot G; Lots 1-26, Block H; Lots 1-27 and HOA Lot 11, Block I, Lots 1-9 and HOA Lots HOA Lots 12-13, Block J; Lots 1-30 and HOA Lot 14, Block K; Lots 1-20 and HOA Lot 15, Block L; Lots 1-18, Block M; Lots 1-33, Block N; and Lots 1-40 and HOA Lots 17-18, Block O, Meadow Creek Addition, to the City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas, being an approximate 137.02-acre tract of land, of which 83.22 acres is in the William S. Hogue Survey, Abstract Number 385, Wise County, Texas, and of which 53.80 acres is in the Smith Bowen Survey, Abstract Number 51, City of Decatur, Wise County, Texas. A complete legal description of the property is found on the plat exhibit located in the staff report. (Application PP2022- 01—Mr. Troy Lewis, on behalf of Rick and Derek McCarley)] ITEM NUMBER FOUR. DEDRA. [INAUDIBLE] AGENDA ITEM FOUR. THAT SHOULD BE. THAT'S A PUBLIC HEARING. IT SAID NONPUBLIC. STAND BY. OH, I'M SORRY. IT'S A PRELIMINARY PLAN. MY BAD, THAT'S ON ME. [CHUCKLING] GAVE ME A HEART ATTACK. YOU? I'M SITTING HERE THINKING, WHAT!? [CHUCKLING] NO, WE'RE GOOD. THIS IS MR. TROY LEWIS'S REQUEST ON BEHALF OF RICK AND DERRICK MCCARLEY, A PRELIMINARY PLAT LOTS 1 THROUGH 71 AND HOA LOTS 1 THROUGH FIVE BLOCK AA LOTS 1 THROUGH 68 AND HOA LOT SIX BLOCK B LOTS 1 THROUGH 14 HOA LOT SEVEN BLOCK C LOTS 1 THROUGH 32 AND A LOT EIGHT. BLOCK D LOTS 1 THROUGH 23 BLOCK E LOTS 1 THROUGH 25 AND HOA LOT 9 BLOCK F LOTS 1 THROUGH 44 AND A LOT 10. THAT SHOULD BE BLOCK G LOTS 1 THROUGH 26 BLOCK H LOTS 1 THROUGH 27 AND HOA LOT 11 BLOCK I, LOTS 1 THROUGH 9 AND HOA LOTS 12 THROUGH 13 BLOCK J LOTS, 1 THROUGH 30 IN HOA LOT 14 BLOCK K, LOTS 1 THROUGH 20 AND HOA LOT 15 BLOCK L LOTS 1 THROUGH 18 BLOCK M LOTS 1 THROUGH 33 BLOCK N AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 40 AND HOA LOTS 17. BLOCK O MEADOW CREEK ADDITION. THIS IS AN APPROXIMATE 137.02 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OF WHICH 83.22 ACRES LOCATED IN THE WILLIAM S. HOGUE SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER 185 AND 53.8 ACRES--GO BACK, CHERYL--IS LOCATED IN THE SMITH BOWEN SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 51. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. SIMILAR SITUATION, IN THIS CASE, OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S A LOT OF LOTS; THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES WITH THIS PLANT FROM PUBLIC WORKS SIDE AND PLANNING SIDE. THEY RESUBMITTED, STILL HAD ISSUES, AND THEN WE GOT A RESUBMITTAL TODAY, 10 MINUTES BEFORE THE MEETING, WHICH I DON'T THINK ALL HAS HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW AND I CERTAINLY HAVE NOT [00:15:02] HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW. THEY DID SPEAK TO CHERYL AND SAID THAT THEY WANTED THIS TO CONTINUE ON TO CITY COUNCIL. NO, DEDRA WE HAD A DISCUSSION, BUT WE'RE STICKING WITH OUR REQUEST TO EXTEND. WHO IS THIS? THIS IS TROY, ROCKWATER DEVELOPMENTS. OKAY. GOOD EVENING. OKAY, WELL, WITH THAT SAID THEN, THEY HAVE SUBMITTED AN EXTENSION. STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION. THAT WILL GIVE US TIME TO REVIEW THE RESUBMITTED OR REVIEW THE RESUBMITTAL AND IF THEY HAVE ANY OTHER OUTSTANDING ISSUES FOR THEM TO ADDRESS. JUST LIKE WITH THE PREVIOUS ITEM STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVING THE EXTENSION. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT. THAT IS CORRECT. NOW THAT WE KNOW THAT THEY WANT TO DO THE EXTENSION, THAT WASN'T OUR UNDERSTANDING PREVIOUSLY. IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR CONCERNS. DOES MR. LEWIS HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO, JUST HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. WE'VE GONE BACK AND FORTH ON A COUPLE, I THINK WE'VE REVIEWED TWO SETS OF COMMENTS FROM THE CITY, SO WE SIMPLY SENT THE MOST RECENT REPLY TO THOSE COMMENTS. THE FIRST ONE WAS LATE LAST EVENING AND THEN WE RESENT IT TODAY. SO IT WAS COMPRESSED AND HAD A FOLLOW UP THAT WAS REQUESTED BY THE CITY, AND WE UNDERSTAND IT WAS LAST MINUTE BEFORE THIS MEETING. WE WERE JUST SENDING IT AS SOON AS WE HAD IT. SO WE'RE HAPPY TO JUST FOCUS ON GETTING THE EXTENSION AND WE'LL CIRCLE BACK NEXT MONTH ON THE PROCESS. JUST TO REFRESH MY MEMORY, HOW MANY TOTAL LOTS IS THIS? SOMEBODY ADD THEM UP IN THEIR HEAD. RIGHT AROUND 480. THROUGH THIS PROCESS, WE'VE DROPPED A COUPLE OF LOTS TO BETTER MANAGE SOME OF THE OFFSETS ON SOME CORNER, LOTS AND WHATNOT. SO IT MIGHT BE 479 AT THIS POINT. I'D HAVE TO DOUBLE CHECK THAT. THAT'S A LOT OF LOTS. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR TROY? COMMENTS, CONCERNS ABOUT THIS. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. [INAUDIBLE] A MOTION FOR THE 30 DAY EXTENSION. [INAUDIBLE] 30 DAY EXTENSION. I'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 30 DAY EXTENSION BY CURTIS CRESWELL. I NEED A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. JOHN LANIER WITH THE SECOND. THOSE IN FAVOR AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? 30 DAY EXTENSION IS GRANTED. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HAVE A GOOD REST OF THE EVENING. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY, FOR YOUR INFORMATION, ITEMS NUMBER FIVE, [ITEM 5: Discussion of future agenda new business items, staff requests and potential special called meeting and/or workshop requests] DEDRA. OUR DEADLINE WAS MONDAY AND WE DID RECEIVE A SUP APPLICATION. SO THAT INFORMATION THAT'S ON THE SLIDE, IS NOT CORRECT. SO THERE WILL BE ONE APPLICATION PLUS THE PLATS THAT YOU EXTENDED 30 DAYS. OKAY, ANYTHING ELSE, DEDRA? NO, SIR. I HAVE ONE QUESTION, IF IT'S OKAY. IT IS ABSOLUTELY OKAY. OKAY, DEDRA, DID THE CITY COUNCIL OFFICIALLY APPROVE OUR REVIEW PROCESS FOR--YES , THEY DID. ALL RIGHT, SO I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE CURTIS HANG AROUND FOREVER, BUT I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHERE THAT STANDS. WE NOW NEED TO SEND OUT THE APPLICATION TO FOLKS. THAT INCLUDES MR. L. AND ANOTHER PERSON WHO EXPRESSED AN INTEREST A WHILE BACK, AND THEN WE'LL FORWARD THAT TO YOU GUYS ONCE WE GET THEIR APPLICATIONS BACK. OKAY, I WAS HOPING MAYBE CURTIS WOULD FORGET ABOUT THIS. I WAS KIND OF HOPING THAT, TOO. WE HAVE A PRETTY GOOD THING GOING. I THINK THE APPLICANT POOL IS GOING TO BE A GOOD ONE. I DON'T THINK WE'VE HAD ANY MORE INTEREST OTHER THAN THIS OTHER FELLOW. [00:20:05] SO I THINK IT'LL BE GOOD. IT'LL PROBABLY BE TOUGH. YEAH, WELL, IT'S BEEN POSTED THE WHOLE TIME. WE'VE NOT TAKEN IT DOWN. OKAY, AND I'M SORRY, I WAS TALKING TO MY BUDDY REAL CLOSE FRIEND, CURTIS. DID YOU SAY YOU HAD NO APPLICATIONS? NO, WE DO. WE HAD AN ADDITIONAL ONE PROBABLY THREE MONTHS AGO, CHERYL, TWO OR THREE MONTHS AGO. SO WE NEED TO MAKE SURE HE'S STILL INTERESTED AND HAVE HIM COMPLETE THE NEW APPLICATION AND HAVE MR. L. COMPLETE THE NEW APPLICATION IF HE'S STILL INTERESTED. SO POTENTIALLY WE MIGHT BE REVIEWING APPLICATIONS NEXT TIME? YES. OKAY, WELL, IF THAT'S IT, THEN I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN THIS--THAT IS IT, ISN'T IT, DEDRA? YES, SIR. WELL, THEN, BY GOLLY, WE'RE GOING TO ADJOURN. IT IS NOW 5:55. HAVE A GREAT EVENING. YOU TOO. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.